sometimesuk:I'm confused now then.
Which optionn available at the moment gives the best picture quality. For argument sake, the one with the highest bit rate. Satalite (Sky), Virgin (Cable), FreeviewHD, or Freesat?IMO,without side by side comparison thats going to be hard to answer-To many variables.You cant just compare bitrates, it varies wildly from channel to channel,let alone across the various platforms.
Daveh75, I'm no expert but I would imagine that there would be no cost saving for transmitting at a lower bit rate, as after all, the original content is "downmixed" by a computer to a lower bitrate / compression format. I cant see how selecting one format over another attracts increase costs Depends on the broadcaster. For smaller broadcasters on satellite,yes bitrates will have cost implications, because they lease capacity/bandwidth on satellite transponders, so the higher the bitrate,the more capacity they're using.
This isn't the case for the BBC,because they lease entire transponders. So they're paying for the full capacity of a transponder regardless of whether they use it.So the BBC excuse of reducing costs is a poor one, they're not saving money,they're actually wasting around 8Mbps of bandwidth