Clare Newsome:
fr0g:Cinema won't (and never should) change for the sake of the shape of a TV...In the end most films are intended for the cinema first and foremost.
Though interestingly, the 'threat' of TV was a contributory factor for movie-makers changing to the widescreen formats in the 1950s. They wanted to tempt people back into cinemas with the promise of "Cinemascope!" et al...
Brilliant grasp of cinema history. I remember studying how 'cinemascope' was perceived to be the biggest step in film exhibition since colour. Some cinemas even fitted huge curved screen to give more vivid experience. In 1955, The Cobweb starring the great Richard Widmark was released in an aspect ratio of 2.55:1!!
In the early days of television, the studios refused to have their films shown on television. They were scared of the effect that it would have on the theatres - and with just cause. Eventually they relented and the rest is history. It's funny how we've come full circle now with people demanding that films should be filmed to fit to fit their tv screens. To me this is ignorance of a great artform. Theatrical exhibition isn't dead. In fact there are more actual 'screens' than ever due to the proliferation of the modern multiplex. If you can make a film that is a truly quality cinematic experience (The Dark Knight springs to mind), you can get people off their sofas.