Quality difference from a DragonFly v1.0 and Arcam Miniblink

djsick

New member
Jan 3, 2015
5
0
0
Visit site
Dear all,

I have a Dragonfly v1.0 connect from my MAC to my Marrantz Amps (PM 6004). The cable dangle and It takes time to connect with frying noise (Is-it because the Dragonfly USB dangle too much, it hard to know, I still don't understand why - if someone had experience this too please let me know -). So I am thinking to buy a Wireless DAC like the MiniBlink of Arcam... However I am worried the the overall quality of this MiniBlink compare to the Dragonfly which is very nice to me... when it want to work.

The IrDAC of Arcam seems great speccially for its superior quality DAC... but I will still have cables if I want to connect it to my MAC. Should I wait that Arcam release an wireless version of IrDAC ? An improve an AirDAC ?

What is your thoughts ?

Jerome
 

djsick

New member
Jan 3, 2015
5
0
0
Visit site
For the frying noise of the Dragonfly, I think I have just find out that my Dragonfly is simply not working properly. (the sample rate 44,100 and 88,200khz only make noise strangely, 48000khz and 96000khz works fine)... peculiar

If someone have ideas how the the Miniblink perform , let me know please.

Thanks.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts