survivor:
lonely boy:gwynne61:Thank goodness for punk, prog was so pretentious, had forgotten about 1970's hairiness too
Punk can and has been just as pretentious, also it has been around for just as long. The whole "Punk vs Prog" thing was and is still peddled by third rate revisionist music journalists from the 1970's.
Well said Lonely Boy.
Does anyone really believe that Punk only `happened` because of the existence of Prog? What a load of rubbish. Punk happened because it happened and I`m glad it did, it was fun and exciting. The intro to `Pretty Vacant` is still, 30 years later one of my all time favourites.
I`ve always thought it sad that a genre of music so filled with brilliant musicians and originality should be derided so much. Of course time is a great teller and many years later many are starting to realise what a mistake they made and how much enjoyment they`ve missed out on. If only they`d thought for themselves instead of jumping on the bandwagon. `Ah, yeah well Punk happened because of Prog like dinnit?` Hmmnn... where did you hear that I wonder?
Of course if you really don`t like Prog then fine, it`s not everyone`s cup of tea. To many a song that lasts over four minutes is a definate no go.(My missus is one of those!) I`ve always been of the opinion that the more variety in the charts the better. Looking back at the late 70`s it was a golden era with a little of something for everyone. I also seem to remember Emerson,Lake and Palmer having a massive hit with `Fanfare For The Common Man` right in the middle of the Punk explosion.
Calm down fella, my second post regurgitated below was similar to what you are saying, just putting down my recollection of the times. Will call Henry Kissinger to negotiate cease fire
lonely boy:gwynne61:Thank goodness for punk, prog was so pretentious, had forgotten about 1970's hairiness too
Punk
can and has been just as pretentious, also it has been around for just
as long. The whole "Punk vs Prog" thing was and is still peddled by
third rate revisionist music journalists from the 1970's.
Don't
know if you are old enough to remember the actual punk era, but as a
teenager in 76 the choice of decent music was very limited, either what
you could catch on tv or listen to John Peel or Alan Freeman on the
radio. The journalists you refer to did not influence my and many other
teenagers listening habits (and no doubt as Andrew states above jumped
bandwagons), but Peel did, a look at the change in his playlists will
confirm this over the period 76-78. Whilst 90% of punk was trash and in
terms of sales was a lot smaller than say Abba who dominated along with
Boney M! etc.
My point is that prog was so self centred that it
did not appeal to a mass market due to its complexity and the self
indulgence and pomposity of the musicians who needed a kick up the
bottom to realise it, hence punk and Johnny Rotten and Joe Strummer
calling year zero on music. Robert Wyatt on the programme accepted
change as did Genesis (of whom I was a fan alongside other bands of the
day, whether punk, prog or just good music), and managed to appeal to
different markets hence massive 80's success.
No doubt the X Factor will be looked on fondly in 30 years