PMC... are they that good?

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the What HiFi community: the world's leading independent guide to buying and owning hi-fi and home entertainment products.

Noddy

Well-known member
Perhaps God is deaf?
Maybe that was intended merely as a joke with no substance, however someone who spends huge amounts of time showing us what hifi components are actually doing is surely doing us a service. Obviously you have to listen to the things, in the end that’s what counts, but measurements allow us to see behind the often grandiose claims of some manufacturers. The hifi world is full of charlatans selling woo. A good example is Mcintosh, not my cup of tea, and very expensive, but measurements by Amir and others prove that their performance is top notch. In contrast he and others showed that the Wiim Mini has a high grade digital output, but a mediocre analogue output.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DougK1 and Gray

Revolutions

Well-known member
Using measurements can just as easily be another way of selling woo.

I find ASR useful & I doubt anyone will say the site doesn’t offer a helpful service. But it can just as quickly become a cult of remote decision making without doing the only thing that really matters: listening to it.

I don’t mean this as a dig, but all the McKintosh & WiiM measurements show is that the expensive product measures well & the budget product has limitations. A useful indicator, sure. Which means that anything more is just as objective as a reviewer’s opinion.
 
Last edited:

Clarkey_71

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2007
249
127
18,970
Visit site
Been using PMC for 15+ years. My previous OB1s were one of the best hifi purchases I ever made. I believe Andrew Everard, once of this parish, still refers to his as his reference speaker.
I consider myself very fortunate to have been able to upgrade to my 25/26s. I'd listened to them several times at my local dealers and always promised myself I would buy a pair should I ever be able to.
Graphs aside, I love them.
 

Noddy

Well-known member
Using measurements can just as easily be another way of selling woo.
How? I thought woo meant making claims of magical qualities.
I find ASR useful & I doubt anyone will say the site doesn’t offer a helpful service. But it can just as quickly become a cult of remote decision making without doing the only thing that really matters: listening to it.
Measurements are just a way to know what is going on. They tell you if the speaker neutral, highly voiced, deficient in bass, lacks dispersion etc. And if you don’t care, you ignore them.
I don’t mean this as a dig, but all the McKintosh & WiiM measurements show is that the expensive product measures well & the budget product has limitations. A useful indicator, sure.
Exactly. But some expensive gear can perform poorly e.g. excessive distortion.
I'd agree that, just because something measures well (whatever that means), doesn't mean it will sound good as you cannot simply test one item on its own. It needs to be part of a system.
These days a decent DAC should sound like any other decent DAC, they’re almost all based round an off the shelf chip. Amps assuming of decent quality should all sound the same too, unless voiced, or valve based . Streamers are streamers, you pay for features e.g. a nice case, a pretty screen, fancy knobs, support for Tidal etc. If you’re someone who thinks DACs above a modest price point differ, you won’t want measurements.

Speakers on the other hand do differ, markedly so. Most are strongly voiced, and knowing how is useful. If your room handles bass badly, you might want a lighter bass. If your like brightness, you look for increased treble.

I need measurements as I can’t make head nor tail of most reviews. Big spacious presentation. Eh? Gliding along the tracks with a nimble footed assuredness. Sorry, come again? The [amp] is insightful and subtle. Okay dokey, if you say so. Full bodied and smooth. Are you sure that’s an amp, and not a pint of Guinness?

Honestly I learn zero from subjective reviews other than specs and the impressions of the appearance and build quality. I think the truth is that reviewers see themselves as creatives, and they have neither the time nor the expertise to take measurements. They have a living to make, taking measurements is not viable, it’s too costly. And I think they see themselves as especially talented listeners, people with discerning tastes.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts