I'm with Tallyho on this.
There is a price for a certain size of screen and within that there is a band, from worst to best. But the difference cannot be as great as the price difference between the best and the next best. Pioneer are wonderful, I've had a couple in the last year, 427 and 4270 and I think they are the Rolls Royce of TVs, but they're not as superior as they should be for the price difference.
The real criminal in all this is Bang and Olufsen. They want £10,000 for a 50inch. Unbe*****inglievable. They make Pioneer look cheap. Except that they don't. Pioneer never looks cheap. I'd rather have a Pioneer than a B&O any day of the week month or year. Reason is simple. Buy a Pioneer and everyone knows that you know your stuff and have bought the best. You get the pleasure of enjoying the best TV on the market and anyone who doesn't know, just thinks, what a lovely picture. Buy a B&O and everyone asks what it costs and anyone with an ounce of brains then thinks what a tool you are for wasting money. At least that's what I think about them. Buy a Pioneer and give the rest to charity for goodness sake.
So, it is possible to find a worse example of excess than Pioneer, but they could narrow the gap a bit.