I recently acquired a NuForce DDA-100 integrated amplifier. It is a direct digital amp (DDA) in a similar vein to the NAD D 7050 - but without all the other gubbins like Airplay and Bluetooth. It outputs 50W into 8 ohms and has 4 digital inputs.
It is connect to a Mac Mini via USB playing ALAC files from iTunes. Speakers are Kef Q500 with QED Silver Annivesary cables.
According to the manufacturer it requires 75 hours of burn in time, this has been verified by other people on various other hifi forums. So far I am about half way through the burn in time.
Impressions so far? Well its a mixed bag to be honest and the results seem to vary between recordings. For instance, I listened to Radiohead's The Bends album and it sound thin, two dimensional and flat. I even had to double check that it was an Apple Lossless and not MP3. So then I swapped to Chemical Brothers' Exit Planet Dust and it was a completely different story. The Chem's sound amazing - crisp clear treble, deep bass, big soundstage and lots of depth (sort of sounded more 3D than the 2D Radiohead).
Its a similar story elsewhere, one minute it sounds crap (Bjork's Debut) and then it sounds awesome (Sasha's Xpander). One minute I am considering returning it and the next I am hooked. I've not experienced this kind of difference before - usually if its sounds good then its good full stop.
So the jury is still out for me. :?
It is connect to a Mac Mini via USB playing ALAC files from iTunes. Speakers are Kef Q500 with QED Silver Annivesary cables.
According to the manufacturer it requires 75 hours of burn in time, this has been verified by other people on various other hifi forums. So far I am about half way through the burn in time.
Impressions so far? Well its a mixed bag to be honest and the results seem to vary between recordings. For instance, I listened to Radiohead's The Bends album and it sound thin, two dimensional and flat. I even had to double check that it was an Apple Lossless and not MP3. So then I swapped to Chemical Brothers' Exit Planet Dust and it was a completely different story. The Chem's sound amazing - crisp clear treble, deep bass, big soundstage and lots of depth (sort of sounded more 3D than the 2D Radiohead).
Its a similar story elsewhere, one minute it sounds crap (Bjork's Debut) and then it sounds awesome (Sasha's Xpander). One minute I am considering returning it and the next I am hooked. I've not experienced this kind of difference before - usually if its sounds good then its good full stop.
So the jury is still out for me. :?