The current Mobile Fidelity controversy has vindicated my view on having no desire for vinyl for reasons of sound quality. Not because I don't believe vinyl doesn't sound good, it just doesn't warrant the myth or cost.
To those who are disappointed by Mobile Fidelity, just remember some records like Donald Fagen's The Nightfly way back in 1982 was recorded digitally and cut straight to vinyl. So don't be too surprised.
Now, somewhat contradicting myself but not really, I do believe vinyl can sound superior to digital playback because....
I stand under correction but I believe 'premium' but mass market DACs such as ESS, Wolfson, TI et al may actually be inferior to DACs 20 to 30 years ago in terms of imaging and stereo seperation. I will exclude Linn and Chord equipment from this accusation because they are effectively engineering their own DACs, and I haven't had the privilege of hearing their latest stuff.
So coming back to Mobile Fidelity, I've seen two videos by reputable experts or high grade amateurs giving opposing counterpoints. One is veteran Steve Guttenberg and the other Ana(Digi)Log, and both validate my view of vinyl.
I also wonder why Linn has not produced direct drive prototypes, being a self-confessed research company. Maybe they have in secret.
Some Linn owners were like current Porsche owners. They won't hear any criticism about the 'razor' gearshift, saying the gearbox itself necessitates it - which is of course bs because the shift itself is electronic, and they can replace the razor with something phallic or resembling a small silicon balloon if they want.
To those who are disappointed by Mobile Fidelity, just remember some records like Donald Fagen's The Nightfly way back in 1982 was recorded digitally and cut straight to vinyl. So don't be too surprised.
Now, somewhat contradicting myself but not really, I do believe vinyl can sound superior to digital playback because....
I stand under correction but I believe 'premium' but mass market DACs such as ESS, Wolfson, TI et al may actually be inferior to DACs 20 to 30 years ago in terms of imaging and stereo seperation. I will exclude Linn and Chord equipment from this accusation because they are effectively engineering their own DACs, and I haven't had the privilege of hearing their latest stuff.
So coming back to Mobile Fidelity, I've seen two videos by reputable experts or high grade amateurs giving opposing counterpoints. One is veteran Steve Guttenberg and the other Ana(Digi)Log, and both validate my view of vinyl.
I also wonder why Linn has not produced direct drive prototypes, being a self-confessed research company. Maybe they have in secret.
Some Linn owners were like current Porsche owners. They won't hear any criticism about the 'razor' gearshift, saying the gearbox itself necessitates it - which is of course bs because the shift itself is electronic, and they can replace the razor with something phallic or resembling a small silicon balloon if they want.
Last edited: