KLH007 said:
How about some new owners with the SI994 input boards chime in on how the NC500 sounds. Maybe some owners who have changed to the 994 from Sparkos/Burson, let us know the changes. Come on, stop listening for 5 minutes and post. LOL
My comments are based upon using a Benchmark DAC2 and PMC OB1i speakers in a 20’ x 13’ room. Before the Nords I was mainly using a Bryston 4B SST (£3,000 ish) and sometimes an AVC KT88 triode connected valve amp (£1,400 and superb for the price).
I bought my pair of Nord 500MB Ups fitted initially with the Burston Op Amps. They were pretty good at low level detail but in comparison with both my amps they were dull and lifeless. I told Colin I wanted to send them back but fortunately he persuaded me to try the Sparkos Op Amps.
The Sparkos solved most of the problems instantly and I was now hearing superb ‘music’. They instantly made the Nords sound better than the Bryston 4B SST in all but ultimate dynamics. The dynamics of the Sparkos were vastly better than the valve amp but noticeably less capable of imaging and portraying the effortless detail, timbre, air and realism that (only?) a valve amp can give. BUT they gave a slightly warm, musical sound and they delivered more than adequate dynamics. The Nords were now a delight to listen to.
When the Nord rev C board came out I tried them with the Sparkos and it made an obvious difference. It improved the imaging slightly and very slightly improved timbre etc. It is still not up to valve standards in those areas but the Rev C boards were a very worthwhile improvement. I relaxed into listening to the music rather than the hifi, loving what I was listening to. Curiosity eventually got the better of me and I ordered the Sonic Imagery 994 Op Amps.
With the name ‘Sonic Imagery’ I expected them to be good at ‘imaging’. They are slightly better in that regard than the Sparkos but not dramatically so. Fine detail, venue acoustics and timbre are slightly improved but that may simply be due to their mid-forward character (see below).
The SI 994 bass is noticeably reduced from the Sparkos and gone is that slight Sparkos warmth. It doesn’t sound sterile but it doesn’t always sound musical either. Listening to a simple recording such as Carol Kid’s Autumn in New York or Suzanne Vega’s Solitude Standing is an absolute delight. The SI 994s treat voices extremely well and simple recordings are reproduced brilliantly. But, and it is a big BUT for me, I fear that the extra voice clarity is being provided partly by emphasising the mid frequencies. If I get hold of a meter to test that belief, I will report my findings here.
If you listen to more complicated music, sadly it is less than impressive. Orchestral music is diminished in scale and grandeur although you can of course hear the middle frequency instruments better than usual. The problem is that orchestras really don’t sound like that. They have been made to sound artificial, much as from a glorified transistor radio, and there is little of the sense of the realism that I am used to hearing with the Sparkos and with other systems I own too.
Well produced ‘pop’ such as Dire Straits’ Brothers in Arms is again made to sound very odd. The middle frequency emphasis makes many tracks sound frenetic rather than musical. ‘The Man’s too Strong’ is always a good test as those mid track ‘crescendos’ can sound a complete mess. My main system usually makes a good job of that track but not with the SI 994s. The ‘noisy bit’ was just made too noisy and virtually overwhelmed the strummed guitar which continues quietly through the 'noise'.
I will try them for a while longer to see if they change with more use but I currently think that I will be plugging the Sparkos back in.
If you only play simple music and/or if your system is bottom heavy, these MAY be just what you need.