tonky said:
I'd love to hear how those speakers sound. I remember hearing the Jim Rogers 149 speakers in a demo about 35 years ago. They lacked bass extension and were very inefficient but had such a clarity and a spacious 3d image of the music. Other speakers I heard sounded so much flatter. I ended up buying something more efficient for my A and R A60 amp.
I regretted not buying them in years to come . (Very expensive pre-owned) I often wonder why some speaker manufacturers do not pursue this cylindrical (steel? ) design. At a reasonable price.
How much do the ATC EL150SE's cost and do they have a similar sound signature to the JR149 speakers? (ie wonderfully spacious clear 3d sound).
cheers tonky
I have two pairs myself, after growing up on them in the 70s as my dad had a pair. I loved them back then, and still love them now. At one point, I temporarily used a 3.0 system with JR149s, and while I as a little scared to push them, they still sounded great, although there was a hint of harshness creeping in.
For anyone who has a pair, if you take the bottom plate off, you'll see a small potentiometer, which varies the HF unit - I used to do this to my dad's pair to suit my ear. I don't know whether my dad ever noticed...
They do lack low end bass (they're small!), but like the LS50s, the bass they do have is nicely balanced. I too have wondered why some manufacturer hasn't copied the design, particularly now we have more efficient Class D amplification (as I was using with mine).