Hi,
Just read the review of the new NAD cd player, according to what hifi it made the marantz cd6002 sound less clear and focused, compared to the new Arcam, Arcam is slightly more detail and more solid bottom end - but the new NAD is more enjoyable and exciting to listen to. Welcome back NAD.
I had a NADC542 and it compared will the cambridge 640 c v2 - it was a very musical machine however the 640c v2 was a little more detailed but more clinical sounding. I am looking forward to having a listen sometime soon. Has any one compared it to other cd players?
Cheers,
Steve.
Just read the review of the new NAD cd player, according to what hifi it made the marantz cd6002 sound less clear and focused, compared to the new Arcam, Arcam is slightly more detail and more solid bottom end - but the new NAD is more enjoyable and exciting to listen to. Welcome back NAD.
I had a NADC542 and it compared will the cambridge 640 c v2 - it was a very musical machine however the 640c v2 was a little more detailed but more clinical sounding. I am looking forward to having a listen sometime soon. Has any one compared it to other cd players?
Cheers,
Steve.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram