Jota180 said:
drummerman said:
For me, the low damping factor of Naim amplifiers make up part of its musicality, given a sympathetic speaker match. Something they have in common with some valve amplifiers as well as an infectious rythmic drive.
It may not be totally correct in hifi terms but it gives them their distinctive sound. That and high frequency limitation. Naim amplifier are not wide-bandwidth. This in itself has some advantages.
There is talk about a new generation of Naim amplifiers and I for one hope they stay true to their house sound.
Can't comment on Hegel (other than looks) but on paper they read like very controlling and hifi which probably appeals to many. Their power too will suit many speakers and yes, they will no doubt go louder than most Naim amplifiers but do they sound as involving?
For myself, most of my listening takes place at lowish volume so how an amplifier performs at half a watt to perhaps ten at most, is really more important than outright loudness. This of course necessitates speakers that have comparable characteristics.
My H160 is every bit as involving as my NAP 100 was. Without a proper A/B it's hard to say exactly what the differences are but there was one area that was clearly obvious and that was bass control. It's probably an unfair comparison given the price difference.
Slightly
If you use a speaker with less inherent acoustic damping, a high damping factor amplifier will certainly assert more control in that area.
On the other hand, if your speakers have high inherent acoustic damping and you use something like your Hegel, the result could, on paper at least, look somewhat dry and lean ...
Like I said, I have never heard a Hegel so my comments relate more to the Naim sound which I happen to like a bit.
I would equally love to build a nice system around the Hegel, if I could afford one! (and if it was prettier)