Managed to scrape a few bob together and considering these 2 amps. L III available online for 479 and the CA is 549. Not enough cash to do the speakers as well so which will be the best match with the gear listed below (speaker upgrade will follow at a later date). I think I know which way this will swing but your input is appreciated.
Kandy L III or CA 740A
- Thread starter admin_exported
- Start date
If it's those two alone, I'd be inclined towards the LIII over the CA, but I think it suits my ears more based on reviews. I think they are two quite different amps sonically, the 740A being a bit warmer?
You should be able to get a used Kandy cheaper on Ebay, if you are willing to go that road. I've been following the offers a bit, and quite a few come up regularly.
Hedgehog
Hedgehog
If you're considering the CA 740A, then why not go one better and have a look at the 840A (if there are still some available) at the wallet-friendly price of 400 notes?
seconded momo72. Richer sounds should have some in the clearance section. A bit controversial but I'd go for the CA. The roksans a bit boring imo
chebby
Well-known member
- Jun 2, 2008
- 1,257
- 34
- 19,220
Given that you already have a CA 640 CD player and a CA Dacmagic, then it must make sense to keep whatever system synergy you already enjoy and go for the CA 740A.
(Of course the 840a will allow balanced XLR operation with your DacMagic and - by default - your 640 CD player too if you connect it to the DacMagic with an optical cable.)
And it will look better.
(Of course the 840a will allow balanced XLR operation with your DacMagic and - by default - your 640 CD player too if you connect it to the DacMagic with an optical cable.)
And it will look better.
matthewpiano
Well-known member
- Nov 23, 2007
- 494
- 334
- 19,270
The 740A is a big upgrade over the 640A. I'm confident you'd be very pleased with it and I'm also confident its a better amp than the Roksan.
ear:are balanced outputs much better?I use a chord crimson cable and noticed a little bit of an improvement with XLRs when auditioning the 840 kit. A tad clearer, a tad richer. Minor improvements tho.
matthewpiano
Well-known member
- Nov 23, 2007
- 494
- 334
- 19,270
Cypher:
Maybe the new Azur 650 A ?
From what a friend who works for Richers has said, I don't think this would be enough of an upgrade from the 640A. Better off with the 740A to make the change worthwhile.
Maybe the new Azur 650 A ?
From what a friend who works for Richers has said, I don't think this would be enough of an upgrade from the 640A. Better off with the 740A to make the change worthwhile.
Minor confusion on some posts I think....my current amp is the 540 not the 640.....I suppose that can only mean that the upgrade will be more worthwhile.
I have to say I am surprised by the posts here cos I would have put money on ppl saying go for the LIII and forget the CA but most of the replies say the opposite.. Not that I am complaining, the CA gear is good VFM and available locally which is a plus.
I have to say I am surprised by the posts here cos I would have put money on ppl saying go for the LIII and forget the CA but most of the replies say the opposite.. Not that I am complaining, the CA gear is good VFM and available locally which is a plus.
matthewpiano
Well-known member
- Nov 23, 2007
- 494
- 334
- 19,270
Yeah sorry mate, I was looking at your CD player model number it seems!!
Still, go for the 740A. Its considerably better than the 640A, so I would imagine you'll see a very big upgrade from your 540A.
Still, go for the 740A. Its considerably better than the 640A, so I would imagine you'll see a very big upgrade from your 540A.
Similar threads
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram