Is there much difference in network streamers if internal DAC is bypassed?

Hondoe1950

Well-known member
Sep 6, 2024
35
39
70
i've seen another discussion on this forum about this issue but would love feedback that is authoritative on it:

If I bypass the DAC in my streamer, is there any real difference between a $400 streamer and a much more expensive one in music quality?

Thanks!
 
...but would love feedback that is authoritative on it:
My feedback was authoritative....to me.

I've compared two 'bit perfect' streaming transports, via the same DAC / amp / speakers.
Due to the familiarity of the test track, I heard an unmistakable difference.
I reckon I would have to point out the difference - but I'm pretty sure that, once noticed, anyone (with no worse hearing than me) would have heard it too.
(There was little (if any) real difference in price between my streaming sources).

The test outcome went against my expectation.
That's all I can say 😐
 
Hmmmmm
DAC alone I’d agree very little difference…..But the circuit and clocking of the path design DOES make a difference..
My NODE ICON sounds more impressive than the considerably more expensive EXN100
 
Hmmmmm
DAC alone I’d agree very little difference…..But the circuit and clocking of the path design DOES make a difference..
My NODE ICON sounds more impressive than the considerably more expensive EXN100
I agree, Node Icon is one of kings today. EXN 100 is a bit outdated, especialy looking on tornado from East full of Eversolo with very good dacs, etc. Here I will look, If I have to choose some streamer. Dac issue is I think also quite personal/subjective. I recommend to try by yourself. What works for your neighbour, shouldn't work in your living room. BR.
 
From my personal experience, I have had a succession of different DACs and each replacement has given me some uplift in the sound quality.
Not the kind of difference you'll notice if you upgrade your amp or speakers.

The more expensive units are likely to have better clock, better components, better power supplies, it isn't just about the DAC. The ecosystem is far more important than the chipset.

It can be hit or miss if you choose the wrong DAC, so always do your own research before making the purchase.

Some bespoke setups like custom FPGA can deliver better results than chipsets. Like the Chord DACs that are highly regarded. My media player Vovofox, which I'm using as a digital transport has it's own FPGA and it really sounds good. I can't decide as a standalone DAC if the sound is better than my Matrix Streamer DAC.
I decided to let sleeping dogs lie.

Also as an alternative to chipset solutions, there's R2R or Ladder circuitry. Some prefer the softness of R2R, again your own ears will decide for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The_Lecht_Rocks
Would love feedback that is authoritative on it.
Hmm. What do you regard as authoritative?

Where Hi-Fi is concerned I am not sure there is anyone that fits the bill.

As an example (and honestly not starting a cable debate or whether people can hear differences or not etc), at the Bristol Show, the Arcam engineer was truly baffled at how much people spend on cables (mentioning Chord who were further along the ground floor). In my opinion, an engineer from Arcam is pretty authoritative but would 100% of people take his view on cables? Not a chance. 😊

In my experience, (and assuming you mean feeding two different streamers into the same DAC), I have not noticed a difference in sound - although I personally did this with CD players and not streamers).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Al ears
Like @Messiah I'm not sure what 'authoritative' means.

I'm a network engineer working with bit rates way higher than audio file formats. I.e. Ethernet networks up to 100 Gbps. Getting the 1s and 0s from one box to another should not influence anything. The only possible influences could be noise introduced in the cable you just added to the path (shouldn't happen: anyone can make a decent cable). But if you've introduced some interference or a ground loop you might get noise. Noise basically can persuade the receiving device that it's seen a '1' where it should have seen a '0'. Optical ls pretty much immune from any of this, natch. If I can get 40 Gbps over 10km via optic I'd take with a pinch of salt anyone on here arguing otherwise.

The degree of benefit you'll hear will in part depend on where the timing occurs. You want the clock on the target fancy DAC to do the timing.

With regard to the overall setup, you can view the digital path as transparent with the caveat above. I have no doubt that DACs (the boxes) vary in sound due to the various other elements such as the analogue amplification bits, as opposed to DACs (the chips).
 
Hmm. What do you regard as authoritative?

Where Hi-Fi is concerned I am not sure there is anyone that fits the bill.

As an example (and honestly not starting a cable debate or whether people can hear differences or not etc), at the Bristol Show, the Arcam engineer was truly baffled at how much people spend on cables (mentioning Chord who were further along the ground floor). In my opinion, an engineer from Arcam is pretty authoritative but would 100% of people take his view on cables? Not a chance. 😊

In my experience, (and assuming you mean feeding two different streamers into the same DAC), I have not noticed a difference in sound - although I personally did this with CD players and not streamers).
What I've noticed in the last few years is that more and more people are realising the audiophile cable market is a big scam. There are so many authoritative videos on YouTube now that explain why it's a con, show evidence and explain about placebo effect and biases.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts