Is sound quality really all that matters?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the What HiFi community: the world's leading independent guide to buying and owning hi-fi and home entertainment products.

Ajani

New member
Apr 9, 2008
42
0
0
Visit site
Andrewjvt said:
Looks dont come into it at all for me. Its not furniture or a shrine

Do you have a separate room for your HiFi (man-cave) or is it in your living room? I normally find that persons with a man-cave and/or are single don't care as much (or at all) about looks, since it's not like anyone but them will have to look at it.
 

Ajani

New member
Apr 9, 2008
42
0
0
Visit site
davedotco said:
matt49 said:
davedotco said:
I wouldn't. If I started buying better equipment the limitations of the lossy files starts to become noticeable, particularly with regard to recorded ambience and soundstage.

I know just how good top equipment can sound with the best recordings, using inferior source material compromises performance at this level so I am not going there.

Are we talking Spotify Premium here? If so, I thought your view of 320kbps was that it was only distinguishable from lossless files by people who knew what artefacts to listen for, in which case your argument seems a bit self-defeating.

That is quite true but applicable to decent rather than outstanding systems, If you recall I was talking in context of an 'up to £2k' system. As is often the case, on an informal forum precise language is not always the case.

If I was attempting to build and fine tune an outstanding system, I would want the source to be beyond criticism, spatial and ambient information, is critical here and are the sort of things affected by lossy compression. I consider this to be of less importance in the kind of mid-fi system I am likely to buy.

Fair enough. At a certain level, when you're trying to squeeze out every last drop of performance out of a system everything starts to matter. Heck, if I'm dropping over a $100K on a HiFi system, I'd even spare some change for some fancy cables (regardless of whether I really believe they will make a difference or not).
 

MajorFubar

New member
Mar 3, 2010
690
6
0
Visit site
The music is the most important thing for me. If I didn't enjoy music I wouldn't just buy a hifi and watch it collect dust just for the sake of having a hifi. But unlike some people who have the (perhaps enviable) ability to become emotionally wrapt in some Mahler symphony played on an AM transistor radio, my enjoyment of the music, and my emotional involvement with it, is governed to a very large degree by how much I enjoy listening to the system it's being played on. Sure I can listen to a favourite piece of music on that same AM radio and appreciate it, but it doesn't engage me the same as listening it to on a higher-calibre system.

As for aesthetic appeal, I'm an early Cyrus owner so what do I know about good looking HiFi. My kit was descibed as ugly by many even when it was new.
 

jmjones

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2009
51
15
18,545
Visit site
Hey Vlad,

With regards to that Chord unit, I have to say that beauty may only be skin deep, but ugly goes down to the BONE. That's one ugly ******, and would definitely distract me from trying to listen to some decent music.

Good thread!
 

matt49

Well-known member
Apr 7, 2013
51
1
18,540
Visit site
davedotco said:
That is quite true but applicable to decent rather than outstanding systems, If you recall I was talking in context of an 'up to £2k' system. As is often the case, on an informal forum precise language is not always the case.

If I was attempting to build and fine tune an outstanding system, I would want the source to be beyond criticism, spatial and ambient information, is critical here and are the sort of things affected by lossy compression. I consider this to be of less importance in the kind of mid-fi system I am likely to buy.

Understood.

And I suppose this is a sign of the widening gap between hi-fi and pop/rock music (c.p. the loudness wars etc etc). Like you I use a streaming service to explore new recordings. I can listen to new stuff every day, and I do. But it's lossless streaming through Qobuz classical, and it sounds impeccable through a highly resolving system.
 

davedotco

New member
Apr 24, 2013
20
1
0
Visit site
matt49 said:
davedotco said:
That is quite true but applicable to decent rather than outstanding systems, If you recall I was talking in context of an 'up to £2k' system. As is often the case, on an informal forum precise language is not always the case.

If I was attempting to build and fine tune an outstanding system, I would want the source to be beyond criticism, spatial and ambient information, is critical here and are the sort of things affected by lossy compression. I consider this to be of less importance in the kind of mid-fi system I am likely to buy.

Understood.

And I suppose this is a sign of the widening gap between hi-fi and pop/rock music (c.p. the loudness wars etc etc). Like you I use a streaming service to explore new recordings. I can listen to new stuff every day, and I do. But it's lossless streaming through Qobuz classical, and it sounds impeccable through a highly resolving system.

Modern pop/rock recordings are awful, but there is so much out there that I simply will not waste my time listening to them.

More seriously, have you formed an opinion regarding Qobuz full fat and Spotify premium? I am assuming that lossless is better, is it quantifiable in any way?
 

Vladimir

New member
Dec 26, 2013
220
7
0
Visit site
jmjones said:
Hey Vlad,

With regards to that Chord unit, I have to say that beauty may only be skin deep, but ugly goes down to the BONE. That's one ugly ******, and would definitely distract me from trying to listen to some decent music.

Good thread!

Can't be saved even by leather and aluminium. Still looks like cheap kids walkman.

xQyPBrK.png
 

matt49

Well-known member
Apr 7, 2013
51
1
18,540
Visit site
davedotco said:
More seriously, have you formed an opinion regarding Qobuz full fat and Spotify premium? I am assuming that lossless is better, is it quantifiable in any way?

I'm afraid I haven't done a serious comparison. (Our Spotify Premium account is hogged day and night by the teenage daughters.) All I know is that Qobuz lossless is excellent.
 

drummerman

New member
Jan 18, 2008
540
5
0
Visit site
Ajani said:
Andrewjvt said:
Looks dont come into it at all for me. Its not furniture or a shrine

Do you have a separate room for your HiFi (man-cave) or is it in your living room? I normally find that persons with a man-cave and/or are single don't care as much (or at all) about looks, since it's not like anyone but them will have to look at it.

Nop, he uses Schmegel ;-)
 

drummerman

New member
Jan 18, 2008
540
5
0
Visit site
Al ears said:
jjbomber said:
Noooooo. Cyrus Lyric 09. I rest my case.

A veritable bargain sir as now available for half initial asking price. You c a n always cover it with a nice embroidered table cloth. :)

I admit not one of cyrus's finest design moments and it shows why the company has stuck for so long to the tried/tested (and lovely made) magnesium/alloy shoe box cases.

It even makes a Hegel look attractive ... .

Perhaps they should contract a design studio next time rather than letting an apprentice loose on it.

Still, it is apparently very good and sure offers a lot for the money.
 
This has been a very interesting thread and read. For me it's the song first, SQ second and looks last in priority.

The majority of the time I can still really enjoy a great song on a bad sound system, even via poor sources, like the built-in computer speakers but I'll just make a note to listen to it on my Hi-Fi system later, to hopefully enjoy the song/album even more :)

I'd rarely ever play a song/album that doesn't make me want to tap along, or sing along or make me feel some sort of emotion, just for the sake of showing off the quality of the recording to myself to anybody else, if that makes any sense. Starts with a great song first, for me :)

Cheers guys !
 

ErwinC

New member
Nov 24, 2009
53
0
0
Visit site
After many, many years i finally found my ideal setup. It has a fantastic sound, good looks imo, limited nr of components and wires, easy to place and easy to use and all the functionality i need: Naim Unitilite with PMC Twenty.22 speakers. *yahoo*
 

chebby

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2008
1,253
26
19,220
Visit site
Would any of you choose a hi-fi that looks like it is built in a shed/garage because it obviously sounds better? (All the money is spent inside on what counts and not on some p@ncey, southern, university educated, industrial designer right?)
 

Ajani

New member
Apr 9, 2008
42
0
0
Visit site
CnoEvil said:

I hate it when Evil Clowns try to jack my thread!

Actually, your thread is highly relevant to the discussion. A really important factor to me is reliability. Unless a product is dirt cheap, I really want to know that there is a good chancce that I will be able to use it for several years without problem (hopefully until I decide to replace it).

The most important factors to me are convenience/functionality, sound quality, reliability and aesthetics. They are all of similar importance to me.

For example: I'm not going to replace my Deezer account and DAC setup with a Turntable. Regardless of whether a turntable may sound better, because convenience/functionality is important to me. I'm also not going to put that Cyrus broken VCR/Fax Machine/Printer/Scanner/WTH? in my living room cuz I don't want to scare the children. So there has to be a balance.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts