Erocia said:It's an absolute myth that vinyl is better than cd, compact discs superior dynamic range will leave vinyl for dead (the best in recorded music history).
TomSawyer said:Other will probably disagree, but to my mind, if you have an emotional connection to LPs, you know it already, and if you don't it just seems like unecessary complication and expense buying into a second format if you're content with the one you have.
Erocia said:It's an absolute myth that vinyl is better than cd, compact discs superior dynamic range will leave vinyl for dead (the best in recorded music history). Vinyl is the sound of distortion,which totally colours the sound especially the bass. And yes I have heard an high end set up, I owned an linn for several years.
BigH said:TrevC said:manicm said:TrevC said:It's the microphony thing that made me reject direct drive turntables in the 70s. They can be made to feed back at pretty low volumes making the music sound muddy, whereas a good suspended deck like the TD150 i currently use is far better in that regard. I also think a cartridge that can't track the inner groove well is not worthy of serious consideration even if it does sound nice at the beginning of a side. This for me means a high compliance cartridge like a V15 in a low mass arm.
Those must have been badly designed direct-drive turntables then. Our Technics from the early eighties had no such issue. A badly designed turntable is just that, regardless of drive type.
It's the lack of suspension that makes it feed back, so it applies to all non-suspended decks regardless of make. If you can mount the deck on a firm base away from the speakers it isn't such an issue.
The plinths on those Technics were not good, lightweight, transmit noise easily, just tap one with your finger nail. So yes poorly designed. The thin lightweight platter did not help either.
spiny norman said:Erocia said:yes I have heard a high end set up, and I owned a linn for several years.
Fixed that for you. ;-)
TomSawyer said:When I owned a Technics TT in the 90s, I found closing the lid while playing gave a touch more headroom before it fed-back - which I needed back then given the volume levels *wacko*
TomSawyer said:The newer is technically superior but there are subjective and/or emotional aspects that make the older preferable to some that makes them prepared to live with their shortcomings ... if you have an emotional connection to LPs, you know it already, and if you don't it just seems like unecessary complication and expense buying into a second format if you're content with the one you have.
bigfish786 said:Both can be brilliant.
Whats the problem? If you don't like vinyl, don't buy it.
Same goes for CDs.
luckylion100 said:bigfish786 said:Both can be brilliant.
Whats the problem? If you don't like vinyl, don't buy it.
Same goes for CDs.
+1 Some people obvioulsy must have the final word, on everything. Like comparing chalk and cheese...
luckylion100 said:bigfish786 said:Both can be brilliant.
Whats the problem? If you don't like vinyl, don't buy it.
Same goes for CDs.
+1 Some people obvioulsy must have the final word, on everything. Like comparing chalk and cheese...
don't much fancy a chalk and pickle sandwich!ID. said:luckylion100 said:bigfish786 said:Both can be brilliant.
Whats the problem? If you don't like vinyl, don't buy it.
Same goes for CDs.
+1 Some people obvioulsy must have the final word, on everything. Like comparing chalk and cheese...
Both are great sources of calcium?
Al ears said:I did that once and the cheese sandwich won by a country mile...