CnoEvil said:
What if the question was turned on it's head: How often do you agree with WHF's 5 star rated systems, and if not, how would you rate them? PP - hope you don't mind the different slant to your original idea. Cno
Fine by me (what have I said).
To answer your question: No, I don't always agree with WHFIs full monty ratings, but then again, I've never heard the exact systems they've tested. Sure, heard a fair few of the amps, CDPs and speakers but all matched differently.
Perfect example is the Leema. When WHFI had an all-in-one system test with the Stream and Xero speakers, I think they concluded that it was a "exciting sound but not with long listening sessions...". (Sorry, paraphrasing). They also commented on its bright presentation and looks would impress your friends...
I've never heard Leema's speakers or the Stream. Based on my so-called "bright" RS6s and various sources it's everything but bright.
When it comes to system or component appraisal you need to draw a 'middle ground' based on individual items and room acoustics.
EDIT - Hang on, I'm telling porkies here: I have heard WHFIs tester systems. I was invited to do the the Big Q about 18 months or so ago. Their reference systems for that day was:
Speakers: Ruark Sabre III and ATC SCM11; Electronics were Kandy K2 amp and CDP, Yamaha amp & CDP, Naim Nait 5i amp and CDP and Cyrus 6SE
We all chose the last set-up which consisted of the Nait 5i amp/Cyrus 6SE and ATCs. It sounded fine indeed, but the point of this thread is A) Could I live with that system? and B) Regardless of sound repro in their testing rooms - and curiosity - it's interesting to hear the various responses on your own system.