I was at a friends he was showing me his new sony lcd & panasonic blu-ray player that was connected by a highly rated hdmi cable he paid £50 for. His house mate said that he bet we would'nt see the differance if we used his hdmi cable from his set up that he paid £20 for. so we tested them both out & we really could'nt see much of a differance, it got us talking are a lot of cables a waist of money we agreed you can get a bad cable, i do find analogue cables can bring there signature into a sound but if you get a cable that works well no matter the cost spending shed loads more on cables are not going to bring massive gains. what do you think?
how much difference can a cable make
- Thread starter admin_exported
- Start date
Search the forum. There are lots of threads on this. You will find that opinion is somewhat polarised.
Analogue cables make all the difference.
Digital cables- bone of contention, but avoid using cheap & nasty.
That's my two penneth. Now let's hear no more about this.
Digital cables- bone of contention, but avoid using cheap & nasty.
That's my two penneth. Now let's hear no more about this.
why you read it then? only asked this as i use belkin hdmi cables on my sony 40w 2000 lcd , onkyo tx-nr905 amp & sony rdr-hxd970 dvd recorder & wanted to see if it worth upgrading them but was'nt that impressd when shown a friends qed hdmi cable.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram