insider9
Well-known member
That was really my point. Wrong tool for the job. I too come at it ultimately from musicians perspective although not professionally trained but still. Spend a lot of my childhood around live instruments. One of the reason I use ribbon tweeters even though they are measurably worse. Yet, sound more realistic with cymbals but also horns, cellos, etc.CnoEvil said:insider9 said:In which case it was done wrong or you used a wrong solution. Just an impulse correction would improve what you have by a large margin not even touching frequency response.CnoEvil said:I haven't heard Dirac Live....but have not preferred any DSP that I have heard on 2 Channel.
On my AVR600, I much prefer Stereo Direct.
Possibly.
As a family, we all played musical instruments and would occasionally play stuff as a family. The sound didn't need DSP to sound as good as our talents would allow.
In my case, I have used the EQ provided by my AV receiver, through its microphone.
I judge a sound by characteristics that can't be measured.
I'd love it if you were nearer and I could show you what DSP can do. I don't use Dirac Live but do it manually. Takes more time but gives you freedom and is free. You've used IIR filters which I'm not a fan of. Should you only correct the impulse response, phase response which is only possible with FIR. You would get a sharper image with the same frequency response should you wish. But I would suggest removing room interaction (usually below 300Hz).
The whole argument about bass and what they've heard in the studio is quite academic. I can tell you with certainty they must've heard bass in rehearsals. And not just being there but clearly. When you're playing you need to hear one another. Hence as a rule through normal passages you need to be able make out bass lines. But that's only partially to do with loudness. That's my take on it.