Son_of_SJ
Well-known member
gel said:Nice one! Where did you see that?OliG said:I saw the 85" B&O BeoVision Avant yesterday and it was absolutely gorgeous. Notwithstanding its spec being a little lacking.
OliG said:There is a B&O store close to me.
Well, from his response in post number 24 gel seems to have second sight or something, but for the rest of us, can you tell us where "Close to me" is, geographically? By the way, can you remember how much the 85" television cost?
OliG said:I think the debate around 4K TVs has parallels with the one that happened when moving to HD. Some people could not notice much of a differnece and there was a reluctance to repurchase movies that were already owned on DVD. Speaking from my experience, I only repurchased a very small proportion of movies on Blu-Ray.
I agree about the 4K debate being like that concerning the improvements from Standard Definition to High Definition Ready to Full HD. Despite my attraction for very large televisions, I'm still in love with my humble 42" Pioneer 428XD in my bedroom, and it's only HD Ready, not even Full HD 1080p It's good with SD material and pretty decent, though naturally slightly less sharp than newer machines with 1080p Blu-rays. I have not replaced DVDs with their Blu-Ray equivalents because, I'm lucky in that my other, Full HD televisions are very good at upscaling SD material. Indeed, two years ago both one ver y famous industry expert and I failed to notice that I had stupidly played the DVD of Skyfall instead of the Blu-ray, because the upscaling on my then Samsung PS64D8000 plasma television was so good.
OliG said:The Hollywood machine keeps on rolling and all it usually takes is a 'killer app' to convince people to upgrade. When I saw some 4K movies demoed on Sony's media server, I was sold on the format. It is just a case of waiting for the specs to be finalised (HDR etc.) I am watching Sony's 2015 range of TVs with interest.
Samsung's 2015 televisions are also well worth a look,