Can someone recommend me an HDMI cable about 1.5m?

[Deleted member 2457]

As above on Amazon.

 

[Deleted member 2457]

As above on Amazon.

is this one any good?

http://www.amazon.co.uk/IBRA®-PRO-GOLD-BLACK-HD/dp/B0036FLPF0/ref=sr_1_14?ie=UTF8&qid=1454265414&sr=8-14&keywords=hdmi+4k+cable

which ones do you buy? Ta

 

[BIGBERNARDBRESSLAW]

I bought a 5m version of this quite recently, well made, and perfectly good enough.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/CSL-Ethernet-Network-capable-Standard/dp/B00DYQ2BOK/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1454267282&sr=1-2&keywords=CSL+-+2m+Ultra+HD+High+Speed+HDMI+cable

 

[Deleted member 2457]

I bought a 5m version of this quite recently, well made, and perfectly good enough.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/CSL-Ethernet-Network-capable-Standard/dp/B00DYQ2BOK/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1454267282&sr=1-2&keywords=CSL+-+2m+Ultra+HD+High+Speed+HDMI+cable

Cheers mate, that's great!

 

[macdiddy]

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Neet%C2%AE-White-Line-HIGH-SPEED-Ethernet/dp/B002EA11HA/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&qid=1454270736&sr=8-15&keywords=neet+hdmi

I use quite a few of these cables (at different lengths) in my system, very well made for the money.

*music2*

 

[bigboss]

Yes, I've got Neet 10m cable, it's build quality is superb.

 

[Deleted member 2457]

Cheers guys.

 

[Benedict_Arnold]

Main links between HTPC, Blu-Ray, Amazon Fire box, recevier and then to the TV are all Audioquest Chocolate. Expensive but worth it IMHO (and here beginneth the next round of the "Never Ending Argument" about the pros and cons of expensive vs. not expensive HDMI cables, speaker cables, stereo interocnnects, digital interconnects, whether you should put the milk in before the tea or vice versa....), but for the links between all of the sources and the TV directly (bypassing the receiver) I'm using IBRA Luxury Gold, which are available on Amazon.co.uk for eight quid for a 1.5 metre length. Nicely constructed, robust end connectors (always my concern with "not expensive" cables) and the come with a robust, very robust braided nylon or poly-something-anyway sheath. Quite stiff too, which should help stop the cable kinking.

 

[Deleted member 2457]

Main links between HTPC, Blu-Ray, Amazon Fire box, recevier and then to the TV are all Audioquest Chocolate. Expensive but worth it IMHO (and here beginneth the next round of the "Never Ending Argument" about the pros and cons of expensive vs. not expensive HDMI cables, speaker cables, stereo interocnnects, digital interconnects, whether you should put the milk in before the tea or vice versa....), but for the links between all of the sources and the TV directly (bypassing the receiver) I'm using IBRA Luxury Gold, which are available on Amazon.co.uk for eight quid for a 1.5 metre length. Nicely constructed, robust end connectors (always my concern with "not expensive" cables) and the come with a robust, very robust braided nylon or poly-something-anyway sheath. Quite stiff too, which should help stop the cable kinking.

*good*

 

[rocketrazor]

I bought a 5m version of this quite recently, well made, and perfectly good enough.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/CSL-Ethernet-Network-capable-Standard/dp/B00DYQ2BOK/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1454267282&sr=1-2&keywords=CSL+-+2m+Ultra+HD+High+Speed+HDMI+cable

I'd paste a part from this in but it won't let me??

It says Full HD 2160p 4096*2160. Thats not full HD! Infact I have no idea what it is!

 

[Paul.]

4096x2160 is 4K, a cinema aspect ratio resolution. 3840x2160 is UHD, a 16:9 aspect ratio resolution. So many people called UHD incorrectly as 4K it eventually also got called 4K. UHD TVs don't have over four thousand pixels horizontal resolution so to the pedant they are not 4K.

2160p can refer to either 4K or UHD (or confusingly UHD 4K as everything is now called)

 

[Deleted member 2457]

4096x2160 is 4K, a cinema aspect ratio resolution. 3840x2160 is UHD, a 16:9 aspect ratio resolution. So many people called UHD incorrectly as 4K it eventually also got called 4K. UHD TVs don't have over four thousand pixels horizontal resolution so to the pedant they are not 4K.

2160p can refer to either 4K or UHD (or confusingly UHD 4K as everything is now called)

*good*

 

[Benedict_Arnold]

Bottom line is if it's says UHD, 4K or any combination of the two, it'll handle 1080p and lower resolutions as well as 4K.

 

[Deleted member 2457]

Bottom line is if it's says UHD, 4K or any combination of the two, it'll handle 1080p and lower resolutions as well as 4K.

Cheers!

 

[rocketrazor]

4096x2160 is 4K, a cinema aspect ratio resolution. 3840x2160 is UHD, a 16:9 aspect ratio resolution. So many people called UHD incorrectly as 4K it eventually also got called 4K. UHD TVs don't have over four thousand pixels horizontal resolution so to the pedant they are not 4K.

2160p can refer to either 4K or UHD (or confusingly UHD 4K as everything is now called)

Cool, cheers

 

[rocketrazor]

Bottom line is if it's says UHD, 4K or any combination of the two, it'll handle 1080p and lower resolutions as well as 4K.

Wicked, ta