I am interested in buying a new TV, but can anyone tell me if I bought a very good 2D TV tomorrow e.g. Sony Bravia 46Z5800 would this TV be able to receive 3D signals or would it need a firmware upgrade?
-
Direct messages between forum members have now been disabled. - Get all the details here.
Can a 2D TV be upgraded to 3D via firmware?
- Thread starter admin_exported
- Start date
Mr.E is correct of course, but may I ask a question related to the subject of this 3D shenanigans?
Taking the bluray 3D version of Coraline as an example, even when using the rather flimsy cardboard Crapp-O-visioN
glasses that come in the box, I get a really convincing 3D image on my Sony KDL-52W4500 screen and also some amazing depth when using a projector.
As someone who has obviously seen some of these new dedicated 3D screens in action, is this new technology so much better than the current solution?
I have yet to see one of the new generation sets in action and need some convincing arguments if I'm going to have to relegate the 52" set to the bedroom to make way for the new kid on the block . . . .
Taking the bluray 3D version of Coraline as an example, even when using the rather flimsy cardboard Crapp-O-visioN
As someone who has obviously seen some of these new dedicated 3D screens in action, is this new technology so much better than the current solution?
I have yet to see one of the new generation sets in action and need some convincing arguments if I'm going to have to relegate the 52" set to the bedroom to make way for the new kid on the block . . . .
Well, the idea is that the coloured glasses version consists of two images overlaid on one frame, so effectively you're getting lower resolution in 3D.
The forthcoming 3D system will use alternating images at full resolution, displayed twice as fast, so you're effectively getting the equivalent of 1080p 3D.
Is it better? Just as I wouldn't pronounce on the sound of a hi-fi component based on a show demonstration or manufacturer's presentation, so I'll reserve judgment on how good 3D is until I've seen at home. If I really have to...
The forthcoming 3D system will use alternating images at full resolution, displayed twice as fast, so you're effectively getting the equivalent of 1080p 3D.
Is it better? Just as I wouldn't pronounce on the sound of a hi-fi component based on a show demonstration or manufacturer's presentation, so I'll reserve judgment on how good 3D is until I've seen at home. If I really have to...
Don't worry, having to sit around wearing battery-powered glasses is probably grounds for divorce as a result of intolerable behaviour.
And of course 'not tonight, I have a headache' may soon become more than just an excuse...
And of course 'not tonight, I have a headache' may soon become more than just an excuse...
Hmm, battery powered goggles eh?
Now that does sound like the first sign of madness.
She'll probably have me locked up for insanity, never mind divorce.
I can see it now, being charged with assault and battery.
Thrown in a dry cell, probably next to a couple of poles.
But then getting discharged the next day . . . .
Sorry, couldn't resist.
By the way, don't you ever sleep?
Now that does sound like the first sign of madness.
She'll probably have me locked up for insanity, never mind divorce.
I can see it now, being charged with assault and battery.
Thrown in a dry cell, probably next to a couple of poles.
But then getting discharged the next day . . . .
Sorry, couldn't resist.
By the way, don't you ever sleep?
I've been fortunate enough to see active shutter, polarised and good ol'anaglyph/colourcode 3D, and the newer systems (polarised and active shutter) are miles better, with far less headache-inducing impact on focus and stability. I'm still not sure I want either system in my home, but that's another matter.
And no, Andrew never sleeps.
And no, Andrew never sleeps.
Andy Kerr:
I'm still not sure I want either system in my home, but that's another matter.
I think you have hit the nail on the head. I have yet to meet someone who is remotely interested in replacing their current gear for the dubious pleasure of (at least initially) a tiny amount of 3d content that you can only view with special glasses. I reckon it will be about as successful as the C5.
I'm still not sure I want either system in my home, but that's another matter.
I think you have hit the nail on the head. I have yet to meet someone who is remotely interested in replacing their current gear for the dubious pleasure of (at least initially) a tiny amount of 3d content that you can only view with special glasses. I reckon it will be about as successful as the C5.
ElectroMan
Well-known member
- Nov 20, 2008
- 30
- 0
- 18,540
I did have a 3D LCD shutter glasses system for my old CRT television, and the 3D effects, at their best, were amazing.
However, after an hour or two it was quite fatiguing. There has been some discussion on how comfortable the new 3D glasses will be. I think that most people would find the LCD ones tiring on the eyes after a while. Also, 3D itself may become irritating after the novelty wears off.
However, after an hour or two it was quite fatiguing. There has been some discussion on how comfortable the new 3D glasses will be. I think that most people would find the LCD ones tiring on the eyes after a while. Also, 3D itself may become irritating after the novelty wears off.
ElectroMan:I did have a 3D LCD shutter glasses system for my old CRT television, and the 3D effects, at their best, were amazing.
However, after an hour or two it was quite fatiguing. There has been some discussion on how comfortable the new 3D glasses will be. I think that most people would find the LCD ones tiring on the eyes after a while. Also, 3D itself may become irritating after the novelty wears off.
Although with a CRT TV and shutter glasses you were probably only getting something like 300-line resolution.
However, after an hour or two it was quite fatiguing. There has been some discussion on how comfortable the new 3D glasses will be. I think that most people would find the LCD ones tiring on the eyes after a while. Also, 3D itself may become irritating after the novelty wears off.
Although with a CRT TV and shutter glasses you were probably only getting something like 300-line resolution.
Similar threads
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram