Question Budget proportions?

Cork

Well-known member
Aug 9, 2023
67
52
620
Visit site
This used to be a common discussion topic years ago, and ... I forget what the common answer was! But I'll say 70/30 preferencing speakers. I say that for a couple reasons, (1) most of the sound quality comes from the speakers and (2) speakers will last 30-40 year while electronics are typically 5-10.
 

twinkletoes

Well-known member
Hi all,
Season’s greetings!
How should one proportionalized (is that even a word) thier hifi budget?
Out of your 100% budget how would you split this between your amp and speakers?

Love to know yours thoughts on this!
It really depends on what you’re buying. Sensitive speakers don’t need so much power so amps tend to be cheaper. So speakers then amp

But, there's always a but!

In an age where even budget speakers present difficult loads to amps and where integrated’s have now become a central hub for everything ie there also now the source. More of the budget should be allocated to “amp”

In my mind “the best speakers you can get” type thinking just doesn’t hold up now.

Either 50 50 or 80 20 split in favour of the amp/source . Speakers offer so much quality sound these days all your really buying is better finishing.

But you do you and buy what you like the look of it’s your money and one works hard for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DougK1

DougK1

Well-known member
Jan 4, 2024
595
849
1,270
Visit site
I've previously found joy in the balanced budget approach - equal spend on all items, (excluding cables as I'm a non-believer). However, I've also found equal joy in cheaper speakers with a more expensive amp, etc. Conversely, the same cannot be said for a cheap amp attempting to drive expensive speakers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: matthewpianist

Cork

Well-known member
Aug 9, 2023
67
52
620
Visit site
I'm sorry, but you guys are crazy. Not like bad people crazy, more loony running around with your eyeballs hanging out crazy.

You can get a great receiver that produces fantastic sound for $600. The rest is bells and whistles (bells and whistles that we all love, but nonetheless). Excellent speakers are $1000.
 

hybridauth_Facebook_664715932

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2014
103
14
18,595
Visit site
Interesting!
Thank you all very much for the responses.
It seems general consensus is to spend more on speakers as speakers are more expensive compared to amps.
In my system it’s almost 50/50. please note, I bought my amp 2nd hand otherwise cost of would’ve been almost double compared to speakers.
I am of the opinion that a good amp is needed to get the maximum out of speakers. Your speakers will sound only as good as the amp they are driven by. Speakers are indeed the most important part of the hifi system and a good amp is a must to ensure their performance is optimum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DougK1

matthewpianist

Well-known member
It also depends on the mix between old and new in your system, and whether you've bought at full price or on an offer. I bought my Omnia half price because it has been discontinued. I have a choice of speakers, but my current favourites are the JPW Sonatas - late 80s, sealed box in excellent condition and purchased for less than £40. They knock modern budget speakers out comfortably.
 

Roog

Well-known member
May 20, 2016
64
55
18,620
Visit site
I am currently considering changing from 66% amp/ 33% speakers to KEF LS60s so 100% speakers.

For a laugh I am currently experimenting with the same speakers and Fosi V3 mono power amps making the temporary ratio 10% amp / 90% speakers. The reality is it’s not funny, it works very well indeed!
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts