I am looking to get a new 42” screen (Lcd/Plasma) as I want one of the best screens on the market. My seating view point is just 3mts. So it maybe possible to go upto 46” but I am not really wanting to drop under 42” so the new Award winning Sony may not be for me!
So as I have and do love the Pioneer but as I have just found out (Thanks Clare Newsome) that no 42” screen until summer 09 I will have to move to other companies.
The Sony KDL-40W4500 is looking great but I still feel plasma is the better screen type. Plus its only 40” and I don’t really want to go down in size. And I don’t know if the KDL-46W4500 will work within the seating range.
So that takes me back for now to the Panasonic models which I would like to know the following?
How much better on picture is the Pioneer over the Sony? Sound doesn’t matter as I will have a new A/V set up too.
And how much better is the Sony over the best Panasonic?
So if Pioneer had a42” out would it be the Awards 08 or as its expensive would the Sony still be the winner?
Is the Sony the best picture in (40-42”) and in the Sony the best picture under 46” on the market today?
So as I have and do love the Pioneer but as I have just found out (Thanks Clare Newsome) that no 42” screen until summer 09 I will have to move to other companies.
The Sony KDL-40W4500 is looking great but I still feel plasma is the better screen type. Plus its only 40” and I don’t really want to go down in size. And I don’t know if the KDL-46W4500 will work within the seating range.
So that takes me back for now to the Panasonic models which I would like to know the following?
How much better on picture is the Pioneer over the Sony? Sound doesn’t matter as I will have a new A/V set up too.
And how much better is the Sony over the best Panasonic?
So if Pioneer had a42” out would it be the Awards 08 or as its expensive would the Sony still be the winner?
Is the Sony the best picture in (40-42”) and in the Sony the best picture under 46” on the market today?