CnoEvil said:What is your max budget?
steve_1979 said:They have the Dynaudio family sound that you already know and like but with slightly better clarity and dynamic range thanks to them being active. They have two amplifiers built into each speaker (one for the tweeter and one for the woofers) which gives them better control and improves the sound quality.
matt49 said:steve_1979 said:They have the Dynaudio family sound that you already know and like but with slightly better clarity and dynamic range thanks to them being active. They have two amplifiers built into each speaker (one for the tweeter and one for the woofers) which gives them better control and improves the sound quality.
To be fair, that would depend on which amplifier you're using the passives with. It's misleading to say the actives have "better clarity and dynamic range" if you don't say what they're supposedly "better" than.
Matt
steve_1979 said:But from my own experience and also from what I've read of other peoples experience, all of Dynaudio's active speakers have better clarity than their equivalent passive versions of the same speaker.
peterpan said:CnoEvil said:What is your max budget?
The pricerange of a Roksan Caspian or Naim.
peterpan said:The price range of a Roksan Caspian or Naim.
peterpan said:What about Marantz?
I have now a Marantz Pearl Lite. Seems it has no problems to drive the focus 260. But i read that for Dynaudio a bigger amp is better.
I listen to symphonic metal, rock and pop, but can't listen to speakers with agrressive treble. And so after a long search i ended with the Dynaudio. Many would say not the best choice for my music, but with "my ears" it is the best choice.
CnoEvil (nice name....); from all the amps you mention i read they are on the site of bright.
matt49 said:steve_1979 said:But from my own experience and also from what I've read of other peoples experience, all of Dynaudio's active speakers have better clarity than their equivalent passive versions of the same speaker.
... depending on what amplification the passives are used with.
Forigve me for putting words into your mouth, but I think what you're actually saying is: based on a handful of experiences of comparing active Dynaudios with the equivalent passives using amplification at a specific price point (what exactly?), you found the actives had better clarity. And you're now extrapolating from these experiences to the (dubious) conclusion that "all of Dynaudio's speakers have better clarity than the passive versions of the same speaker".
Craig M. said:I'd say that the active version of a passive speaker will have better clarity assuming both are competently designed, and properly powered, full stop.
I'm sure you know what the advantages of an active crossover are, so won't regurgitate the facts.
lpv said:These Xeo 5 speakers.. I wouldn't like to have cable out of my laptop or phone in order to play music.. it's marketed as 'unplug and play' while my m-cr510 with Kef's plays with less cables via Airplay.. I don't understand the idea of being able to move speakers cause they're wireless ( still connected to mains, thought).. speakers usually have one sweet spot in a given room...
peterpan said:CnoEvil said:What is your max budget?
The pricerange of a Roksan Caspian or Naim.