altruistic.lemon said:I mean, how much does it cost to send a loan pair out to reviewers? It's what everybody does, including businesses smaller than AVI such as EB Acoustics. They can't keep up with demand largely because of their positive publicity.
John Duncan said:JMacMan said:I'm sure if Ash spoke nicely to John Duncan
Funny.
lindsayt said:Alec said:lindsayt said:I think it's a huge overstatement to say that John Duncan has wound the membership up over AVI.
I disagree. And I hope certain expeletive deleteds* over there who think I'm oh-so-anti-AVI all the time see this.
*If you think this means you, then it means you.
Can you or Frog or anyone else provide any examples where John Duncan has done this?
Alec said:the concept of "mildly appalling" amuses me...
matthewpiano said:Also worth bearing in mind that all the money a company spends on advertising has to be recouped somewhere - in the price of the products.
Alec said:lindsayt said:Alec said:lindsayt said:I think it's a huge overstatement to say that John Duncan has wound the membership up over AVI.
I disagree. And I hope certain expeletive deleteds* over there who think I'm oh-so-anti-AVI all the time see this.
*If you think this means you, then it means you.
Can you or Frog or anyone else provide any examples where John Duncan has done this?
Sure, look at any recent AVI thread; there's been a lot of them. I will sound very harsh, but JD is a mod and, despite is protestations that he is not WHF, and his odd musing that has revealed he too has no truck with all that cable cobblers (so we know he's a sensible chap deep down) he is a mod, and so the standards should be a little higher for him. This is also true of Ash, and I've siad that there too.
One thing I haven't said here just now as im in a hurry is that, because of their positions of mods, it is very easy for them to make bobbin winding comments. Sorry, i dont mean easy, i mean many comments they make could be constured as such, adn they should acknowledge that and stop making them.
John Duncan said:I think you'll find that I wind *somebody* up every time I open my mouth. Just ask Mrs JD.
JMacMan said:Well, I've just received another email, so as to, it is said, add some 'perspective' as to my alleged anti AVI campaign now on WHF, in that someone has been asked to copy/paste some comments I made re the disengenuious marketing of foo and pseudo science, on AVI forums, over here, in an attempt to discredit me by any means possible it would seem.
Seems like all is fair in love and war.
I'd just refrain from commenting, and point to the post made on Facbook by AJ of AVI and quoted above as to the insulting comments made about the mods and membership here, and well, please form your own opinons.
I must admit, that I am astonished by the politicking, rudeness, insults and general nastiness.
There's only ever been one other cult like experience that I've had that could be described as being similar.... and it wasn't a religious one in the conventional sense, but another one name brand, who employed very similar marketing spiel and obnoxious techniques of attempting to further their commercial interests.
Why should I be surpised at all the personal insults and attacks...
JMac
lindsayt said:Alec said:lindsayt said:I think it's a huge overstatement to say that John Duncan has wound the membership up over AVI.
I disagree. And I hope certain expeletive deleteds* over there who think I'm oh-so-anti-AVI all the time see this.
*If you think this means you, then it means you.
Can you or Frog or anyone else provide any examples where John Duncan has done this?
John Duncan said:I can build websites for a sum beginning at £300, depending on complexity. However, just because somebody wants one, they should not consider my willingness to build one for them a foregone conclusion.
Ajani said:JMacMan said:Well, I've just received another email, so as to, it is said, add some 'perspective' as to my alleged anti AVI campaign now on WHF, in that someone has been asked to copy/paste some comments I made re the disengenuious marketing of foo and pseudo science, on AVI forums, over here, in an attempt to discredit me by any means possible it would seem.
Seems like all is fair in love and war.
I'd just refrain from commenting, and point to the post made on Facbook by AJ of AVI and quoted above as to the insulting comments made about the mods and membership here, and well, please form your own opinons.
I must admit, that I am astonished by the politicking, rudeness, insults and general nastiness.
There's only ever been one other cult like experience that I've had that could be described as being similar.... and it wasn't a religious one in the conventional sense, but another one name brand, who employed very similar marketing spiel and obnoxious techniques of attempting to further their commercial interests.
Why should I be surpised at all the personal insults and attacks...
JMac
Why? As has been said, and sadly ignored, in countless AVI threads; there is a good reason for the attitude towards the brand on this forum. IMO, AJ seems to enjoy bashing other brands, HiFi mags and audiophiles, but can't take any kind of questioning or criticism of his own products.
So I suspect in AJ's mind that he really thinks he and AVI are being persecuted unfairly, when the reality is that all of this negative reaction is really due to how he/AVI present themselves.
This thread actually makes me a little sad. As much fun as I have poking fun at AJ and AVI, I really want to buy a pair of ADM5s, as they would work nicely on my desktop rig. But buying one would make me feel like a tool, with the way AVI keep acting.
ID. said:lindsayt said:Alec said:lindsayt said:I think it's a huge overstatement to say that John Duncan has wound the membership up over AVI.
I disagree. And I hope certain expeletive deleteds* over there who think I'm oh-so-anti-AVI all the time see this.
*If you think this means you, then it means you.
Can you or Frog or anyone else provide any examples where John Duncan has done this?
John Duncan said:I can build websites for a sum beginning at £300, depending on complexity. However, just because somebody wants one, they should not consider my willingness to build one for them a foregone conclusion.
Look! He's doing it again! Some apologists might call it light hearted fun or gentle mocking, but it's obviously dripping with derision and poison.
He also claims to have actually heard ADM9s and didn't think they were for him, which is clearly impossible so he must be a liar :O
Alec said:ID. said:lindsayt said:Alec said:lindsayt said:I think it's a huge overstatement to say that John Duncan has wound the membership up over AVI.
I disagree. And I hope certain expeletive deleteds* over there who think I'm oh-so-anti-AVI all the time see this.
*If you think this means you, then it means you.
Can you or Frog or anyone else provide any examples where John Duncan has done this?
John Duncan said:I can build websites for a sum beginning at £300, depending on complexity. However, just because somebody wants one, they should not consider my willingness to build one for them a foregone conclusion.
Look! He's doing it again! Some apologists might call it light hearted fun or gentle mocking, but it's obviously dripping with derision and poison.
He also claims to have actually heard ADM9s and didn't think they were for him, which is clearly impossible so he must be a liar :O
You dissiassociate me from your remarks, obviously, as I've never accused John of that lie, and his mocking fools who start saying things about how chossy AVI are about who they deall with is quite funny.
However, in order to be consistent I shoudl say that, had he not made that comment, and/or locked the thread, and/or just, well, shut up and been juts a mod, frankly, that would have been preferable.
JMacMan said:but then some people will always deliberately misinterpret things to suit an agenda.
altruistic.lemon said:Looked briefly at my old home away from home (sob) and saw there's a fair amount of support for comments made here about advertising, reviewing and an updated forum. There's also a bunch of people who acknowledge that it was through WHF that they heard of the speakers in the first place.
Maybe there will be peace, once the MD acknowledges that he needs to provide review copies and advertise It would be a shame if the speakers were genuinely good but died on the market because nobody had heard of them.
altruistic.lemon said:Looked briefly at my old home away from home (sob) . . .
jcbrum said:altruistic.lemon said:Looked briefly at my old home away from home (sob) . . .
Have you emailed Ashley yet, lemon, with your demand list for re-joining the AVI forum ?
JC
the record spot said:Like I said, it's the attitude of the company and some of the fanboys that suck big time. If they spent less time on their forum and more time updating their frankly out of date website, they might put a decent day in. Anyone going by it now would try to buy the Neutron 2.1 system, or one version of the ADM9, but so many of the references are out of date (9, 9.1, 9.1T....), ADM40 ready to ship... FFS.
That's the shop window to the wider world. Instead of making petty and snide comments about WHF, or the HiFi press in general (still happy to quote glowing reviews though I see...two-faced or what?!), or tired comments about the membership on this forum, wouldn't it just be better if they got on with their job and canned the rest?