Hello to all. I would like to order a new AT95EX stylus for my AT95E cart. From the reviews I see that AT95EX is slightly better sounding than AT95E but both seem to have exactly the same specs apart from the colour ?
AT95E vs AT95EX
- Thread starter stereoman
- Start date
Al ears
Well-known member
stereoman said:
As they are both replacements for the same cartridge it's a bit odd. Six pounds difference, the only thing I noticed were the words 'bonded shank' for the EX.
Al ears
Well-known member
Al ears said:
lol...actually I think I figured it out why. EX sa 03 x 0.7 mil whereas E has 0.4 x 0.7. EX goes up to 22Khz , E to 20Khz. I think some sites have wrong information about Stylus radii...the cuts are not the same in both. Actually I ordered AT95EX today and will post the sound result.
Al ears
Well-known member
stereoman said:
Please do, knowing Audio Technica there had to be a difference somewhere. So a slightly more refined elliptical tip it is then.
daytona600
Well-known member
Ex variant has different compliance from the standard E version & designed for the LP5 turntable
AT95E must have been sold in the millions over the years both use ellipital stylus profiles , hyper / shibata profiles best options for best sound/pound
AT95E must have been sold in the millions over the years both use ellipital stylus profiles , hyper / shibata profiles best options for best sound/pound
Al ears
Well-known member
The specs are a bit misleading. Actually I found this:
"This cartridge is popular amongst entry to mid-level enthusiasts as it offers excellent value for money. It incorporates an extended frequency response and improved transient response.
Other features include Aluminum pipe cantilever and Dual V Mount magnet configuration which delivers excellent channel separation and low distortion resulting in outstanding tonal quality.
Upgrade to 95E
ATN95Ex is available as an upgraded version of the industry acclaimed AT95E cartridge. As with all the AT90 Series cartridges the AT95EX features ½” geometry and can be mounted on virtually any tonearm or headshell. This cartridge has been chosen by AT engineers to be supplied as standard on the extraordinary AT-LP5 turntable."
The green AT95E is more a generic cart where AT95EX is a slight upgrade. AT95E should have 0.4 x 0.7 whereas AT95EX 0.3 x 0.7. But some sites say both have the same cut.
http://www.audioaffair.co.uk/catalogsearch/result/?q=Audio+Technica+AT95E
"This cartridge is popular amongst entry to mid-level enthusiasts as it offers excellent value for money. It incorporates an extended frequency response and improved transient response.
Other features include Aluminum pipe cantilever and Dual V Mount magnet configuration which delivers excellent channel separation and low distortion resulting in outstanding tonal quality.
Upgrade to 95E
ATN95Ex is available as an upgraded version of the industry acclaimed AT95E cartridge. As with all the AT90 Series cartridges the AT95EX features ½” geometry and can be mounted on virtually any tonearm or headshell. This cartridge has been chosen by AT engineers to be supplied as standard on the extraordinary AT-LP5 turntable."
The green AT95E is more a generic cart where AT95EX is a slight upgrade. AT95E should have 0.4 x 0.7 whereas AT95EX 0.3 x 0.7. But some sites say both have the same cut.
http://www.audioaffair.co.uk/catalogsearch/result/?q=Audio+Technica+AT95E
bigfish786
Moderator
I’ve had both styli. Both have been used as replacement styli in a Clearaudio cartridge which was damaged. I first had the 95e then the EX.
The EX has better detail, and less pops and clicks. Both are very good for the money, but the EX is worth the few extra quid.
The EX has better detail, and less pops and clicks. Both are very good for the money, but the EX is worth the few extra quid.
Hello. Can someone confirm whether the AT95E or AT95EX is really "made in China" ? I just received mine directly from Audio Technica Shop but on the package it says so. I thought that all needles / carts are made in Japan. I will post a quick sound description soon.
Al ears
Well-known member
bigfish786
Moderator
Al ears
Well-known member
stereoman said:bigfish786 said:
So it is produced in both countries. I just got from China. Hmm...
It's quite likely they produce goods in both countries like many manufacturers. I believe most of their turntables are from China.
Al ears said:stereoman said:bigfish786 said:
So it is produced in both countries. I just got from China. Hmm...
It's quite likely they produce goods in both countries like many manufacturers. I believe most of their turntables are from China.
Yes TTs are made in China - but I thought that such things like Stylii or Carts are totally made in Japan. All is ok. A quick sound update:
So the AT95EX ( Chinese version ) yes sounds a bit better than the generic AT95E. Not so much better , do not expect a big difference. The difference is mostly heard in bass - midrange area. The bass is a bit tighter, as to the highs ( some claim a bit better with more resolution ) not so true. The highs are even bit shut in but clear. The whole reproduction is a bit "tighter" in sound. But yes it sounds "better" definitely.
I was just flicking through the reviews on this site when I came across this 'shoot out' review including your turntable. I thought it was an attractive package too, but be prepared for bad news. I was following your comments on the AT 95ex which I think is an improvement on the standard AT 95. Make of it what you will.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_LzV45Ha30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_LzV45Ha30
Jim_W said:
Thanks I will watch it. But even without this I can absolutely confirm that TEAC series are great sounding for the price no matter what. I can fully recommend these TTs. Believe me if they were crap I would write it straight off...
EDIT: Ok I have watched the clip. He must be joking with this unstable speed and pitch & rythm issues. I have not encountered any of this after one year. Teac 300N is superb for the price. Also offers ( if demanding speed adjustment on the bottom ).
Jim_W said:
Must admit that this guy is probably one of the best reviewers on youtube. He's diificult to understand sometimes but he's normally spot-on with his comments.
Alantiggger
Well-known member
iceman16
Well-known member
Stereoman you have a fine turntable without doubt, you adore it and appreciate it. However, it is Chinese made and rolls off the same production line as many other identical turntables with different brand names. They are all built cheaply and suit their price point. I've been there and done it myself with a Pioneer PLX1000, I thought it sounded brilliant until I bought the Marantz... there is absolutely no comparison between the Pioneer and the Marantz, both in build quality and sound quality.
I really don't want to come across as a hi-fi snob but until you've experienced a turntable made in the western hemisphere, or Japan, you will not really fully appreciate what vinyl is capable of reproducing. Unfortunately this hobby requires a lot of cash investment.
I really don't want to come across as a hi-fi snob but until you've experienced a turntable made in the western hemisphere, or Japan, you will not really fully appreciate what vinyl is capable of reproducing. Unfortunately this hobby requires a lot of cash investment.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram