$4,520 Kimber RCA Cable compared with Amazon Basics

[Entrigo]

Feel free to flag up the post and moderation will attend to it. There's a 'report' function at the bottom left of every post.

Thank you. I think you intervened already to keep us in line (I am not very tolerant of personal attacks, so responded in kind 😬🤣).

 

[davidf]

Sums up everything wrong with hobbyists/audiophiles, it's not a bloody religion, or at least shouldn't be

People were happy, until the Roman Emperor rucked up, decided he was the dog's bollox, and amassed a following that hangs on his thumbs up/thumbs down way of doing things. Any product that gets a thumbs down is immediately set upon, slagged off, ripped apart, and ridiculed by his sheep who have never actually heard the product themselves. Most of the time, even the Emperor doesn't listen to it. He creates a witch hunt for anything he classes as not perfect.

So yeah, let's do the religion thing.

He's no different to an audio enthusiast tinkering away in his shed, it's just that he's presented himself in a way he wants others to see him. We've had plenty of those in this industry over the years, offering free Kool-aid to those who will listen and follow the doctrine. Most come and go.

 

[abacus]

To put things in perspective, until verifiable evidence is provided that cables (Assuming they are the correct rating for the job in hand) make a difference to the sound, then all claims they do, are purely opinion, which is fine, as everyone is entitled to an opinion. (Just don't post opinion as fact)
In the end it comes down to the question, do you believe they make a difference? if so then go ahead and buy an expensive cable as its your choice and your choice alone.

Bill

 

[GroeneLeeuw]

Yes, it´s really bad when consumers are made aware there are a lot of bollocks being sold to you for thousands that ar no better(sometimes they plain worse!!) then products that are good or quite good that cost a few hundred.
It´s bad that we, consumers, have been taken for fools being fed BS stories than can rival with any phantasy book.
Yeah, it´s bad.
But funny enough, I don´t think it´s bad at all.

 

[Jasonovich]

To be honest, this argument goes both ways. Although I have been into hifi for about twenty years or so, I am fairly new to the pursuit of the ultimate sound quality. As such, a few months ago was about to fall into the cable trap. So I came on this same forum to ask for opinions. Albeit my post was neutral and, as above, one aimed at getting advice, and so I wasn't at all defending the cable snake oil trade, some responses were really not that balanced or friendly. One member in particular not at all subtly implied I was an idiot for even thinking about it, another member or two sided and applauded this comment... (Which was also very disappointing, as I normally find people in this forum very friendly)

I think one needs to be pragmatic. I accept, paying for cables that costs more than your entire system is beyond daft, it just stupid.

It also contravenes my hifi principles, getting the best sound quality for the least amount of money but I would say HiFi is far more complicated than measurements and graphs.

Multi threaded cables, solid core cables or the combination of both, Teflon sheaths, PVC sheaths, quad wiring etc all exhibit different tonality.
What is the purpose of cables?

Quite simply, to deliver the signal from A to B without degradation. Some cables are more effective in reducing radio interference which can potentially degrade the sound.

At the end of day, it's your prerogative if you have a different view of cables to mine, it's cool. Really! 😎