3D or not 3D, that is the question.

[admin_exported]

Ok guys,

Recently there has been loads of controversy over things like star ratings, 3D, screen size and generally it is all becoming a bit confusing.

I have a budget of £2000 for a new 46/47" screen, which models do you think I should audition? Star ratings are a guide, a trip to the local supplier and decide for yourself is always the best policy, but as I say which models to view?

Not really interested in 3D but if you think a TV which has it, still gives stunning 2D images and is worth auditioning please include it.

One TV I have seen which was very good was LG's 47LE8900, but I am still more of a fan of plasma (more realistic images), come on all which do I check out?

Many thanks

PS £7000 for a TV, don't think so.

 

[Anonymous]

If you're going the 3D route make sure that you check out the glasses that each manufacturer supplies. I wear glasses for watching TV, Driving etc and only Sony and Panasonic 3D glasses fit over the top, Samsung have not made any provision for this which is quite disapointing considering their advances in 3D technology.

 

[aliEnRIK]

leahandanna:
Ok guys,

Recently there has been loads of controversy over things like star ratings, 3D, screen size and generally it is all becoming a bit confusing.

I have a budget of £2000 for a new 46/47" screen, which models do you think I should audition? Star ratings are a guide, a trip to the local supplier and decide for yourself is always the best policy, but as I say which models to view?

I think this just adds to the talk on other threads about how confusing its getting for everyone

Please bring in marks out of 100 WHF (And split up 2D and 3D quality)

 

[6th.replicant]

FWIW: to date, I've been firmly rooted in the anti-3D camp, but I'm wavering since Sony/Polyphony announced that Gran Turismo 5 will be 3D...