Latest activity Postings Featured content About Trophies
-
-
landco replied to the thread Improving Current HiFi setup.asta la vista Physics cannot be fooled; the sound quality of the speakers is determined by the size of the housing and the diameter of... -
landco replied to the thread Improving Current HiFi setup.At a minimum, you need to add a subwoofer (2.1 system, triphonic). The ATC SCM11 are small bookshelf speakers and are not capable of...
-
landco replied to the thread Living in a cell..It doesn’t matter what you use: stands, shelves, tables or something else. It is important that the placement follows basic acoustic...
-
landco replied to the thread Audiophonics amps (Hypex N Core).The power of 2x250W seems excessive to me for home use. Why overpay?
-
landco replied to the thread Best for Stereo: Marantz SR8500 (home theater) or PM7000 (stereo).In audio equipment from first-tier brands (Denon, Marantz, Yamaha, Technics), the power supply does not have any negative effect on the...
-
landco replied to the thread Best for Stereo: Marantz SR8500 (home theater) or PM7000 (stereo).Your answer shows your technical incompetence. I don't even know if I should explain anything to you :joycat:
-
landco replied to the thread Best for Stereo: Marantz SR8500 (home theater) or PM7000 (stereo).In many cases, using room correction improves the sound. In the past era, as today, there were sound correction systems, for example...
-
landco replied to the thread Best for Stereo: Marantz SR8500 (home theater) or PM7000 (stereo).I have the impression that you did not read my previous comment about the importance of the influence of the room on the sound, and...
-
landco replied to the thread The slippery slope.Modern turntables with good mechanics are very expensive, as I understand it. So it's no surprise that a vintage turntable is better.
-
landco replied to the thread Best for Stereo: Marantz SR8500 (home theater) or PM7000 (stereo).This is a big mistake.
-
landco replied to the thread Best for Stereo: Marantz SR8500 (home theater) or PM7000 (stereo).This is a marketing concept, not a technical one.
-
landco replied to the thread Best for Stereo: Marantz SR8500 (home theater) or PM7000 (stereo).As I already said, the main advantage of the receiver is the presence of a Dirac-type sound processor. Of course, you can buy a stereo...
-
landco replied to the thread Best for Stereo: Marantz SR8500 (home theater) or PM7000 (stereo).You are simply repeating audiophile myths that a receiver is worse than a stereo amplifier. The level of distortion is below the hearing...
-
landco replied to the thread Best for Stereo: Marantz SR8500 (home theater) or PM7000 (stereo).You forgot that the receiver has powerful software sound correction capabilities, this is important for setting up the speaker system...
-
landco replied to the thread Best for Stereo: Marantz SR8500 (home theater) or PM7000 (stereo).It is a myth. On the contrary, an AV receiver is a much more intelligent device than a traditional stereo amplifier - it has an audio...
-
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
Arcam CD5 CD player cannot do gapless playback (EDIT - software update now available - see post 86)- Started by ScarboroughMark
- Replies: 180
-
What did you purchase on Black Friday/Cyber Monday Sales?
- Started by Jasonovich
- Replies: 52
-
-
Your old departed HiFi that you still wish you had or greatly lamented and never forgotten.
- Started by Jasonovich
- Replies: 29
-
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram