Alec said:FLAC is not a standard. It is an obscure format few care about. If your wishing were enough, it would be a standard.
I don't understand why Apple should be anything other than deleriously happy with their position.
jerryyeatman said:Alec said:FLAC is not a standard. It is an obscure format few care about. If your wishing were enough, it would be a standard.
I don't understand why Apple should be anything other than deleriously happy with their position.
FLAC is THE standard, and more people care about it than any other lossless format.
I'm sure Apple are deleriously happy with their position, but do you think powerful companies who create needless and incompatible equivalents of accepted standards solely for their own financial gain and control are to be applauded?
If you can have a raging debate on that, I hate to think what happens if you ever discuss politics or religion Since BlackBerry is a trade name with an unnecessarily uppercased middle letter (IMHO), there is no reason it should follow the same rules as the berry, so my default position is to treat all words as having regular plurals unless otherwise informed. Mind you, I find it hard to accept that the plural of mongoose is mongooses.Lee H said:Odd side note. Debate raged in the office one day about BlackBerries or BlackBerrys, leading to contact being made with RIM to be told that it's BlackBerry Mobile Devices.
None, because iTunes doesn't offer it. And the reason it doesn't offer it, if we really cut to the nitty gritty, is because not enough people give a **** about lossless music. Most people like the fact that their 8GB MP3 player can hold three trillion 128K MP3s and they're more than happy with the quality.jerryyeatman said:How many iTunes users buy ALAC?
Cypher said:FLAC is THE standard ?
I think it's the least supported format out there. It should be more popular but it isn't.