just came from auditioning the Spendors - S4, S5, S6. that's just today. yesterday, I had KEF, Dali and the Hecos.
But, back to the Spendors. I always thought I liked the mellow sound but I had totally no affinity for S6, the mellowest of the lot - it sounded way too warm and muddled to me, because the lows sounded really "blunt" (don't have a better term) and the higher tones were not apparent.
S5 was a tad bit bright but more detailed - S4's tone would have been just nice but a tad bit muddled.
Would a more defined / detailed tone equate to brightness? The salesperson told me that S5 sounded "brighter" because the tweeter was larger, improved from the S4 in order to provide more detail.
Overall, for detail, I would prefer S5, but it could do better at louder volumes, which still sounded too loud to me. So far haven't found a speaker that gave me a controlled loud. Except strangely, maybe the KEF, which was to me, quite bright.
I wonder - I still haven't been able to find speakers that can do louder than low volumes well - i.e. without sounding loud and too much for the ears. My normal $20 audio-technica in-ear speakers seem to do better at "containing" the loud.
Maybe only the KEF - and that with the NAD stereo amp. but that was a little bright for my tastes.
is "good" sound something that takes getting used to? you know, maybe it's been a case of eating MacDonalds all your life, and then suddenly being fed real food, real food doesn't match up because you're so used to eating Macs! or do I need to spend more than the US$2K I have budgeted for because anything less just doesn't meet my sound requirements?
anyway, much as I have talked about Tannoys, I still haven't been able to audition them because the DC6Ts are not in stock. I'm wondering how they will perform.....
But, back to the Spendors. I always thought I liked the mellow sound but I had totally no affinity for S6, the mellowest of the lot - it sounded way too warm and muddled to me, because the lows sounded really "blunt" (don't have a better term) and the higher tones were not apparent.
S5 was a tad bit bright but more detailed - S4's tone would have been just nice but a tad bit muddled.
Would a more defined / detailed tone equate to brightness? The salesperson told me that S5 sounded "brighter" because the tweeter was larger, improved from the S4 in order to provide more detail.
Overall, for detail, I would prefer S5, but it could do better at louder volumes, which still sounded too loud to me. So far haven't found a speaker that gave me a controlled loud. Except strangely, maybe the KEF, which was to me, quite bright.
I wonder - I still haven't been able to find speakers that can do louder than low volumes well - i.e. without sounding loud and too much for the ears. My normal $20 audio-technica in-ear speakers seem to do better at "containing" the loud.
Maybe only the KEF - and that with the NAD stereo amp. but that was a little bright for my tastes.
is "good" sound something that takes getting used to? you know, maybe it's been a case of eating MacDonalds all your life, and then suddenly being fed real food, real food doesn't match up because you're so used to eating Macs! or do I need to spend more than the US$2K I have budgeted for because anything less just doesn't meet my sound requirements?
anyway, much as I have talked about Tannoys, I still haven't been able to audition them because the DC6Ts are not in stock. I'm wondering how they will perform.....