A wee point.
To those who say this test conclusively proves the benefits of spending lots of cash on racks, it shows that £660.00 is at least as effective, if not better, than £2000.00.
To those who suggest that the team at WHF are conning themselves and others, and don't present results that contradict their premise, it shows that £660.00 is at least as effective, if not better, than £2000.00.
To those who say this test conclusively proves the benefits of spending lots of cash on racks, it shows that £660.00 is at least as effective, if not better, than £2000.00.
To those who suggest that the team at WHF are conning themselves and others, and don't present results that contradict their premise, it shows that £660.00 is at least as effective, if not better, than £2000.00.
floyd droid:
My new rack.
Just thought i would lighten this thread up a tad.
Not sure it would work very well as isolation could be a problem. You'd also need quite a lot of BluTak.
My new rack.
Just thought i would lighten this thread up a tad.
Not sure it would work very well as isolation could be a problem. You'd also need quite a lot of BluTak.
floyd droid:My new rack.
Just thought i would lighten this thread up a tad.
Careful - you could have someone's eye out with that...
Just thought i would lighten this thread up a tad.
Careful - you could have someone's eye out with that...
Andrew Everard:Yes, it was a blind test, but no-one was actually blinded
Thanks for the clarification. Any thoughts on randomising the order, and including details of the randomisation and blinding process in future features?
Cheers,
Shuggie
Thanks for the clarification. Any thoughts on randomising the order, and including details of the randomisation and blinding process in future features?
Cheers,
Shuggie
Andrew Everard:
Ooo, I like this game:
Blind test that supports your beliefs = there, told you so.
Blind test that challenges your beliefs = we can't trust our ears.
Nice one, jaxwired!
Still on playground duty then?
Ooo, I like this game:
Blind test that supports your beliefs = there, told you so.
Blind test that challenges your beliefs = we can't trust our ears.
Nice one, jaxwired!
Still on playground duty then?
Andrew Everard:floyd droid:My new rack.
Just thought i would lighten this thread up a tad.
Careful - you could have someone's eye out with that...
Sublime andrew
Just thought i would lighten this thread up a tad.
Careful - you could have someone's eye out with that...
Sublime andrew
Alec
Well-known member
Early on in the test, one participant at least was able to say that the speaker stands had been chnged. So were the listeners informed of the nature of the changes after each one?
It would have made the copy impenetrable had we quoted him as saying 'whatever you just did it was like the muddy waters had cleared' and then only revealed at the end of the two pages what the changes were. It could have got footnote-tastic.
Alec
Well-known member
I see your point, i think, but thats what seems to have happened in the cable test - listeners were just refering to system one, two...
So is it just the way it was written, or were hey actually told about the changes after each change?
So is it just the way it was written, or were hey actually told about the changes after each change?
Alec
Well-known member
Similar threads
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
-
-
-
-
I'm a LiAV(!) and the future is Not Vinyl or CD, it's DAC / Streaming, what do yo think?- Started by Jasonovich
- Replies: 43
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram