Spotify Web Player [BETA]

Dave_

Well-known member
Spotify is currently Beta testing a new web based player, which according to various sources is only available to a select few, or via this facebook link

However i had no trouble getting access by going https://play.spotify.com/home and logging in with my Spotify account
 

Dave_

Well-known member
Been using the web player all night, and i think i actually prefer it to the desktop/mobile apps.

Finding the UI much nicer,appears to be muck slicker in use, it loads and plays tracks instantly (always found the desktop a bit laggy in this respect) Given it's use of flash and beta tag i was expecting it to be buggy, but that doesn't appear to be the case, it's been faultless.

Only downside, no offline mode obv.
 

MajorFubar

New member
Mar 3, 2010
690
8
0
Visit site
One thing I'm not right keen on...I've not found an option to stop it posting what you're listening to on F/B. There's an option on the desktop client to disable that.
 

SteveR750

Well-known member
I'm missing somehting here. What are the real advantages of a web based player over the instralled bversion:

given you can install to as many devices as you want

you can sync offline (when it works of course)

-> can save highest quallity files so ISP/ d/load speed independant

Doesn't need flash player (phew)

So far, I can't see one plus for me!
 

Dave_

Well-known member
To give access to as many people as possible.

To keep up with competitors.

There are times/places that you can't/won't be able to download, install and use a desktop app, on a work or friends computer or an unsupported platform for example.

I know for a fact there will be many happy Linux users.

As development on the Linux Preview has been slow to non existent, is unsupported, and only packaged for debian/ubuntu based distros and is only available to premium users.
 

nads

Well-known member
SteveR750 said:
I'm missing somehting here. What are the real advantages of a web based player over the instralled bversion:
to allow people who can not install spotiy on the computers they use for work to use spotify.

to allow people who can not take cameras into work to use spotify.

I might actually pay for spotify when this is launched as i will be able to use it.
 

MajorFubar

New member
Mar 3, 2010
690
8
0
Visit site
I'd hardly call Spotify late to the party: they were one of the first music-streaming services available in the UK, possibly the first.

Rara don't offer a 'try before you buy' free service either.
 

SteveR750

Well-known member
nads said:
SteveR750 said:
I'm missing somehting here. What are the real advantages of a web based player over the instralled bversion:
to allow people who can not install spotiy on the computers they use for work to use spotify.

to allow people who can not take cameras into work to use spotify.

I might actually pay for spotify when this is launched as i will be able to use it.

OK got it. Thanks.
 

jjbomber

Well-known member
jjbomber said:
Given that rara.com do this for 99p a month for 3 months, isn't Spotify just a little bit late to the party? Even after that, rara only charge £4.99. Nice to have some competition though!

rdio.com is free for 6 months and £4.99 after that. Even has an app for mobile fans.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts