Native_bon, your wish is soon granted! Here is the first proper review, as it happens by What Hi-Fi
http://www.whathifi.com/sony/kd-65zd9bu/review
I can accept that What Hi-Fi don't find the Sony 65ZD9 to be the slam-dunk that we all had hoped for. What I can't understand is why What Hi-Fi compared it most with the Samsung 65JS900, which is edge-lit, rather than comparing it with the Samsung 65JS9500, which has full-array local dimming. Mind you, since the 9500 is even better than the 9000, then the Sony would have fared even worse against the Samsung 65JS9500 than it did against the Samsung 65JS900!
We can all recall reviews by What Hi-Fi that were notably at variance with those by other AV sources, for instance of the Oppo 93 (or was it the 103?) Blu-ray player, which What Hi-Fi liked a good deal less than everyone else liked. Maybe this Sony 65ZD9 is another such one.
http://www.whathifi.com/sony/kd-65zd9bu/review
I can accept that What Hi-Fi don't find the Sony 65ZD9 to be the slam-dunk that we all had hoped for. What I can't understand is why What Hi-Fi compared it most with the Samsung 65JS900, which is edge-lit, rather than comparing it with the Samsung 65JS9500, which has full-array local dimming. Mind you, since the 9500 is even better than the 9000, then the Sony would have fared even worse against the Samsung 65JS9500 than it did against the Samsung 65JS900!
We can all recall reviews by What Hi-Fi that were notably at variance with those by other AV sources, for instance of the Oppo 93 (or was it the 103?) Blu-ray player, which What Hi-Fi liked a good deal less than everyone else liked. Maybe this Sony 65ZD9 is another such one.