wireman
New member
kinda said:To me Humax really is the way to go, just for the features, and the firmware and other software updates and utilities that get created. It seems to have a thricing commnunity. It pretty much covers all bases, is easy to use, by all accounts, and one of their recorders can be a hub serving other DLNA clients.
I see where you're coming from, and wouldn't disagree with you in principle... until you consider that for about £100 more, you can buy a full media centre PC which - when running something like XBMC Eden as a front end (which is totally free) - then makes even the Humax look antiquated.
Apart from a Windows/Mac/Linux platform offering proper web-browsing, emailing, and video skype in Hi-Def on your Hi-Def TV, XBMC offers iPlayer, ITV player, 4OD (and hundreds more really usable apps), unrestricted file-format streaming with limitless storage (just keep adding extra GB drives as you need them), non-subscription HD tv, DVD/Blu-Ray player, and even PVR facilities if you feel you really need them (although in reality when you've got all the core On-Demand services, do you really need a PVR anymore?)... again, a thriving community/forum, and a group of developers who continually advance the interface for free simply because they themselves are AV enthusiasts - and it's an interface so slick it makes both the Samsung and (even more so) the Humax look like an old 1980's Amstrad Computer (if you're old enough to remember how rubbish those were).
Samsung's DT7800 seemed to be a first conscious step towards this "media box" direction away from the bog-standard PVR... their soon-to-be-launched DT7900 promises to be a somewhat better implementation (reportedly with a web-browser and full twin-tuner recording/simultaneous streaming). The Humax on the other hand has its' roots firmly in the traditional PVR camp, onto which they're attempting to strap what they can onto the back of it... ultimately (presumably) aiming towards some kind of integrated media centre/youview box (in which I believe they're an active development partner).
At the end of the day, my view was just to cut my losses and endless costly upgrades and just buy what ultimately we'll all end up with either under or in our large Hi-Def screens... something that stems from a computer and not a dedicated/restricted one-trick pony trying to be something it's not.
All just a personal view of course...