matt49
Well-known member
davedotco said:matt49 said:davedotco said:I think an awful lot in this thread is complete nonsense.
In all my years in this business I have come across truly awful rooms perhaps, half a dozen times.
The trick, such as it is, is to match the system, primarily the speakers to the room, remember this is your room, you live in it, talk in it, do whatever in it. More importantly, you are used to it, this is important, the sound of your room is your reality, yes other rooms sound different, but it doesnt matter, you listen in your room and that is what counts.
This is not difficult, except for one thing, the modern obsession with 'bass', the requirement seems to be for huge amounts of it, mostly entirely unnconnected with any music being played, being produced by, in the main, ghastly cheap floorstanders that cost about 2 bob.
I still hear such garbage in peoples homes and as an ex-dealer I am sometimes asked 'what do you think'? Mostly I just smile and say 'wonderful'.
It's remarkable that someone with so much experience and knowledge could talk such utter garbage. But I suppose that's what happens if you have an obsession with speakers that don't produce real bass.
The fact is most rooms in the UK will suffer from very obvious bass modes below 80Hz. The science of this is very well known, and no amount of idle hand-waving will change that.
Any sensible person will realize that by fettling the position of the speakers and listening position, or by applying some DSP to the bass, you can get a very good result. But to claim this isn't an issue is plain silly. *kiss3*
Thank you, that was quite deserved.
Even in 'ranting' mode I can normally make my point and explain my views far more clearly and coherently than my earlier post.
Failing totally to make the distinction between what is possible for the enthusiast and the realities of what is acceptable for many music/hi-fi lovers was I think the cardinal sin.
I'm in the middle of a very busy weekend, if the thread is still running when I have the time, I will revisit.
Dave, I'm glad you realized I wasn't being altogether serious.
David@FrankHarvey said:Unless an EQ system can redirect high frequencies from the driver itself (which it can't), it has to reduce HF exaggeration due to wall reflections without reducing that particular frequency - and then you're fundementally altering the speaker's output, affecting quality. Personally, I'd rather address negative room issues with physical solutions to try and address the major issues.
That's not to say that digital EQ doesn't have its place, as there are instances where physical room solutions just aren't possible.
I'd agree that physical treatments are preferable, though treating bass modes physically is often not practicable. A good general principle is: correct mid-range and HF problems with physical treatments; correct LF problems with DSP.
Why? Because most correction will aim at smoothing off unwanted peaks in a room's response, which generally result from reflections. Physical room treatment aims at preventing the reflections by absorbing (or scattering) soundwaves. For different frequencies, different kinds (and more importantly quantities) of absorbent material are needed, and once you get down to room modes around, say, 60Hz, the thicknesss of absorption required is simply not practicable. (There are other "non-absorbent" ways to treat bass, such as Helmholtz Resonators and other forms of resonating panel designs, but doing this correctly requires a level of expertise well beyond what most of us possess.)
So for most people the only practicable way to treat bass modes will be with DSP. Fortunately there are some simple 'fit and forget' solutions available, e.g. the DSPeaker Anti-Mode.
One important principle to remember is that whilst you can cut off a bass peak using DSP, you shouldn't try to fill a bass null using DSP. Bass nulls arise from cancellation of waves at a particular frequency. Throwing more of that frequency at a room by turning up the bass isn't going to solve the problem, and it may well end up frying your amp.
On the other hand, treating HF reflections physically is relatively easy. It's easy to experiment (hang a duvet on the wall behind the listening position), and it's relatively easy to solve HF problems without turning the room into something that looks like a recording studio.