I saw on another forum that, according to a well-known youtuber, they are almost identical in board design etc...
Darko on the similarities between Platina Stream and Audiolab 9000N
Playing Snap with the Quad Platina Stream and Audiolab 9000N
Darko Audio
When Quad announced its 200wpc Class A/B Platina Integrated last week, we learned that it would contain an ESS 9038PRO-based DAC circuit, a dedicated headphone amplifier and an MM/MC phono board...but no streaming. That would come later with the arrival of the Platina Stream.
Today, that 'later' arrives. According to the press release, the Platina Stream is Quad's first-ever streaming DAC. Right out of the gate, we notice striking similarities to the
Audiolab 9000N -- not on outward appearance, but internally.
The Quad and the Audiolab share a very similar internal board layout (SNAP!) and back panel socket arrangement. Moving left to right: balanced XLR and single-ended RCA analogue outputs, coaxial and TOSLINK inputs, Ethernet, USB-B for source devices and USB-A for USB storage devices (SNAP!).
The Platina Stream also mirrors the Audiolab's DAC chip of choice and its supporting hardware (double SNAP!): an ESS ES9038PRO is laid out in a balanced configuration with dual master clocks, five user-selectable filters and an emphasis on the quality of the
"post-DAC and power supply circuitry".
At 4.3", the
non-touch screens are the same size (SNAP!) and sample rate support - up to 32-bit/768kHz PCM and DSD512 - is identical (SNAP!).
![[Quad-Platina-Stream-3-580x580] [Quad-Platina-Stream-3-580x580]](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fdarko.audio%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F10%2FQuad-Platina-Stream-3-580x580.jpeg&hash=a89db4d6b76551b3bd1b718eea447958)
We can't even separate the Quad from the Audiolab on streaming support: Qobuz Connect, Tidal Connect, Spotify Connect (
with lossless), Roon Ready, UPnP, Apple AirPlay 2 and
Plexamp (SNAP!), all of which are handled on both units by an ARM Cortex-A53 processor running Linux (SNAP!).
On paper, there are more technical similarities between Quad's Platina Stream and the Audiolab 9000N than there are differences. None of this is surprising when we remember that Quad and Audiolab are both owned by China's IAG, which is most likely sharing design resources between the two brands. Why design a new streaming board for Quad when you've already done the hard work for Audiolab?
To be clear: I am not suggesting any grand deception by IAG or Quad. However, this website's news posts must be more than just press release regurgitation. The buying public isn't stupid. They too will spot the Quad<--->Audiolab crossover. Prospective buyers are advised to audition the Audiolab
and the Quad side-by-side at their local IAG dealer, taking note of each streaming DAC's 1) accompanying app, 2) casework heft and 3) knob feel. Perhaps the Quad offers superior build quality to the Audiolab. Or maybe the Platina Stream is aimed squarely at those who already own a Platina Integrated and want the curtains to match the carpet.
From the press release:
"The Platina Stream is a perfect aesthetic match for its amp sibling. It shares the same steel chassis and thick aluminium front panel, with side-mounted heat sinks and anti-resonance feet, providing a reassuring [sic] sturdy feel. It also sports the same elegant fascia, adorned only by a subtle trio of function buttons, a power button...and a rotary control".
However, some might quibble at how the Platina Stream and Platina Integrated share the same DAC chip. This might be just an optics issue but even if both units' converters enjoy different circuit layouts and are bookended by different power supplies and output stages, seeing an ESS ES9038PRO on both units' spec sheets could cause some buyers to hit pause on the Stream...and feed the Platina Integrated digitally with a more affordable third-party device, especially as the Platina Stream sells for £2999 -- £500 more than the Audiolab. Your choice of black or silver.