I can buy both the above tvs at more or less the same price , both just under £600.
I cant make my mind up though ...which is best for picture quailty.
I do like samsungs looks alot better then panasonics and i also do perfer that samsung has usb and internet.
But which would be better?
The panasonic would be 10" bigger , would 50" be a bit to big for someone who only sits like 7-8 feet away from the tv?
Only live in apartment at present so dont want something which will look stupid size wise ,at the time i did think it would look good like going to the pictures , but now thinking about it would it show more flaws? , would it look too stupid for a small living room?
I did have a 42" one previously and friends use to say how massive it was , wonder what they would say to me getting a 50" one lol.
Just took back a Philips 9000 model as i hated the picture quailty for the price , kept getting jaggered edges on people moving etc , gave me a headace more then anything else...not sure if it was faulty or not.
I cant make my mind up though ...which is best for picture quailty.
I do like samsungs looks alot better then panasonics and i also do perfer that samsung has usb and internet.
But which would be better?
The panasonic would be 10" bigger , would 50" be a bit to big for someone who only sits like 7-8 feet away from the tv?
Only live in apartment at present so dont want something which will look stupid size wise ,at the time i did think it would look good like going to the pictures , but now thinking about it would it show more flaws? , would it look too stupid for a small living room?
I did have a 42" one previously and friends use to say how massive it was , wonder what they would say to me getting a 50" one lol.
Just took back a Philips 9000 model as i hated the picture quailty for the price , kept getting jaggered edges on people moving etc , gave me a headace more then anything else...not sure if it was faulty or not.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram