This is actually a really interesting thread, and deserves a more generalised thread rather than just being under NAD amps. I've gone from being a CO2 causes global warming believer, to a complete sceptic and am now in a middle fence sitting position where, basically, from the arguments I've heard from both sides I really don't have a clue!
I think the main thing I've learnt is, whichever side of the fence you sit on, no one denies, global warming is occurring (in the main scientific community anyway). The main argument is whether it's caused by CO2 or not. This then translates within this thread to whether it's caused by us leaving our equipment on standby, or whether it's something natural we have no control of.
My own belief, whichever argument is right is, (a) let's not take any chances and try and switch off our equipment as much as we can. I admit, I don't do it all the time, but as long as I do it 95% of the time, I think that's pretty good. Even if you think it's all a load of baloney, just think, imagine if you are wrong. It's not a lot of effort is it?!; And
(b) I just wish people would stop spending so much money trying to determine whether it is CO2 causing the issue or not, and rather they spend the money looking at solutions to alleviate the issue. Let's face it, barring a revolutionary new, efficient energy producing technology which can be rolled out, en masse, in the next few years, CO2 targets by most countries will be missed (due to the effect making the targets would have on the economy, and no western government worth its weight will let that happen as it's political suicide). We need solutions people, not blame cultures!
Anyway - pretty heavy post for WHF website! I'm sure discussions and disagreements with my views will carry on now!