Matthew - a lot of what you say is correct. Indeed the Wharfedales and MAs largely have different appeal. I've not heard the RX standmount range but read quite a bit on here and in mags and they certainly give the impression of being big and bold.
After hearing GX 100s, RX6 and, of course, the RS range the overriding conclusion is that the silver and gold ranges, in particular, flourish with better amplification. As you know I dislike going into technicalities: If it sounds good than that suffices, and the spec sheet is rapidly dispensed to the recycling bin.
One thing that gives me the grumps (not from you BTW) is when people over-extend their appraisal and pidgen-hole a product because of reputation. We all know there's not a single brand that appeals to all. That's understandable. However, as you're well aware, system matching is such a personal thing, and I'm not just talking about personal preferance, but reams of other influences that determines the 'end sound'.
For 4 years (cripes, have I been on this site for that time?) I've maintained that Arcam and MA are a cracking synergy match. That won't change. Additionally, after hearing most sub-£1000 integrateds with these speakers, who'd guess *certainly not me* that Leema and MA would be a fantastic match?
It's very true that room acoustics needs to take credit in this particular department. And on paper my kit just seems wrong in every respect. But it works beautifully. The only rational explantion alluded to this is the Leema has a such a grip on the MAs much maligned metal dome tweeter, resulting in a far more composed, balanced presentation - generally sweeter.
Phew! I'm going to lay down after writing all this drivel. :twisted: