Hi! I'd like to upgrade my speakers sometime soon.
My current setup now is>
Cambridge Audio CXA61 (60W at 8ohms, 90W at 4ohms).
CA Alva Solo MM Phono Stage
Pioneer PLX1000 with Ortofon 2M Bronze Cartridge
Q Acoustics 3020i speakers
KRK Studio Subwoofer 10" (active)
_______________
The room where they're at is not treated. It's a 36square meters living room with some furniture all around, it's large-ish and the ceiling is somehow a challenge to treat because the lowest part is at 3m high and it's tilted 45 degrees, reaching 6m at the highest part. I'm trying some absorbing panels with a little improvement. I still get some echo because of the height of the ceiling.
I'm pretty satisfied with the sound I get form my listening position, though. However, I still want to upgrade my QA3020is because at a little above 10 o'clock they start to sound confused when I play certain LPs with too much going on (Kamasi Washington, LCD Soundsystem, Deftones, Soundgarden, Nirvana). At lower volumes they sound very good. Not that they sound bad at higher volumes, but I feel like I can get a better sound than these smaller QAs.
My first option is the Monitor Audio Gold 100 5G (1300US$). They are a bit bigger than my QAs but I expect them to deliver a much better sound quality in terms of clarity, dynamics, depth, and not get very saturated (confused comes to mind) at say 85-90db from 3meters away. I know they are still small for my living room with its 6'5" bass driver but paired with the subwoofer, it might be compensated. The MA Gold 100 specs (60-120w, 4ohms, 86db).
Another option are the Monitor Audio Silver 200 (floorstand) (960US$). Which is the Series below the Gold (Specs: 60-150w, 8ohms, 89db, each tower has a 5 1/4 driver for mids and bass and another 5 1/4 for bass only). I've been reading reviews and it seems to me they are aimed more at home theater setup and not exclusively for stereo music playback. They are also smaller floorstanders but I wonder if they could sound better than the Gold 100s at normal volume (85-90db), I hardly ever play loud.
For near field listening at normal volume or a tad higher, would the golds deliver better sound or would the silvers be better due to their bigger cabinet?
Other options are the Martin Logan 35XTi (1600US$) which are said to be great speakers for the CXA61 in the review made by The Master Switch. Specs> 20-150w, 4ohms, 92db, 6,5" bass driver. I can't really find any other reviews pairing them with the CXA61 but the one I mentioned praises the combination.
KEF LS50 Meta (1700US$). I got confused by some reviews saying they need very good amplification to be driven ( I really don't know if my CXA61 could do it) Specs>40-100w, 85db, 8ohms, 5.25" bass driver.
Wharfedale Diamond 12.3 (floorstand)) (1600US$). They cost around 800US$ in some countries, but where I live they are crazy expensive.
Any sort of feedback will be much appreciated!
Thank you!!!
My current setup now is>
Cambridge Audio CXA61 (60W at 8ohms, 90W at 4ohms).
CA Alva Solo MM Phono Stage
Pioneer PLX1000 with Ortofon 2M Bronze Cartridge
Q Acoustics 3020i speakers
KRK Studio Subwoofer 10" (active)
_______________
The room where they're at is not treated. It's a 36square meters living room with some furniture all around, it's large-ish and the ceiling is somehow a challenge to treat because the lowest part is at 3m high and it's tilted 45 degrees, reaching 6m at the highest part. I'm trying some absorbing panels with a little improvement. I still get some echo because of the height of the ceiling.
I'm pretty satisfied with the sound I get form my listening position, though. However, I still want to upgrade my QA3020is because at a little above 10 o'clock they start to sound confused when I play certain LPs with too much going on (Kamasi Washington, LCD Soundsystem, Deftones, Soundgarden, Nirvana). At lower volumes they sound very good. Not that they sound bad at higher volumes, but I feel like I can get a better sound than these smaller QAs.
My first option is the Monitor Audio Gold 100 5G (1300US$). They are a bit bigger than my QAs but I expect them to deliver a much better sound quality in terms of clarity, dynamics, depth, and not get very saturated (confused comes to mind) at say 85-90db from 3meters away. I know they are still small for my living room with its 6'5" bass driver but paired with the subwoofer, it might be compensated. The MA Gold 100 specs (60-120w, 4ohms, 86db).
Another option are the Monitor Audio Silver 200 (floorstand) (960US$). Which is the Series below the Gold (Specs: 60-150w, 8ohms, 89db, each tower has a 5 1/4 driver for mids and bass and another 5 1/4 for bass only). I've been reading reviews and it seems to me they are aimed more at home theater setup and not exclusively for stereo music playback. They are also smaller floorstanders but I wonder if they could sound better than the Gold 100s at normal volume (85-90db), I hardly ever play loud.
For near field listening at normal volume or a tad higher, would the golds deliver better sound or would the silvers be better due to their bigger cabinet?
Other options are the Martin Logan 35XTi (1600US$) which are said to be great speakers for the CXA61 in the review made by The Master Switch. Specs> 20-150w, 4ohms, 92db, 6,5" bass driver. I can't really find any other reviews pairing them with the CXA61 but the one I mentioned praises the combination.
KEF LS50 Meta (1700US$). I got confused by some reviews saying they need very good amplification to be driven ( I really don't know if my CXA61 could do it) Specs>40-100w, 85db, 8ohms, 5.25" bass driver.
Wharfedale Diamond 12.3 (floorstand)) (1600US$). They cost around 800US$ in some countries, but where I live they are crazy expensive.
Any sort of feedback will be much appreciated!
Thank you!!!