Theres a nice little review in the Isotek Sigmas on the
ISOTEK SITE
"
Initially, the GII Sigmas sounded lean and
slightly congested; but that was expected.
After the second day things slowly began to
change and the high frequencies improved
considerably and the images started to focus
within the soundstage. However, the low end
was nothing to write home about and I started
to think that this might be another line
conditioner that robbed the music of body in
the lower registers and I would have an
unsatisfactory listening experience.
But
after just three days of listening (I used
the IsoTek Systems Enhancement CD to speed up
the break-in process),
the low end not only
returned, but erupted with demonstrative
proportions! There was tremendous force and
throughput of bass information that led me to
believe that my woofers circumference had
increased greatly from its two 6 1/2 inch drivers to
a new set of eight inch dynamos."
Ive highlighted those parts as thats EXACTLY what ive found with conditioners. They tend to sound a bit 'off' when first plugged in then after use begins to shine. Its why I question the none believers ~ did they REALLY test them? or just stick one in for 5 minutes before throwing it away?
http://www.isoteksystems.com/
Notice all the glowing reviews down the right hand side (Quite a few from this very mag)
If conditioners truly didnt 'work' as they should then those reviews shouldnt exist