Some cds are poorly produced, even some new ones, so would a album ripped @ 320 (remastered) be better than a poorly produced lossless album?.. advanced thanks
lossless or 320 remastered
- Thread starter admin_exported
- Start date
Do you mean would a remastered album ripped at 320kbps be better than a poorly produced original album in lossless. Depends, if you think the remastered album sounds better then yes. Lossless won't do anything to make a bad album sound any better.
What do you mean by poor production? The original recording, which is part of the sound of a band for example, or the transfer of the master with any additional DSP (loudness, noise reductions etc).
I only ask because I don't get the concept of a good system making anything sound harsh, as if it is so truthfully revealing as to be a positive characteristic. I had some recordings that used to sound a bit rough, but on my current system just have a different balance. In that respect I have re-discovered some albums.
I only ask because I don't get the concept of a good system making anything sound harsh, as if it is so truthfully revealing as to be a positive characteristic. I had some recordings that used to sound a bit rough, but on my current system just have a different balance. In that respect I have re-discovered some albums.
If you want to hear how good, well mastered 320 can sound, listen to Linn Radio....it sounds better than some of my less well mastered CDs.
Similar threads
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram