anyone bought one,anyone want one,seems to be the real deal, gonna check it out in currys over the holiday if theres any left,guys on av seem to be buying them up.
-
Is OLED burn-in a problem? We want your input on one of TV’s hottest topics!
lg eg960v
- Thread starter his dudeness
- Start date
It's an exciting breakthrough, and I DO really want one. The price will have to come down, and I'll have to have a good year at work to be able to afford one though, so we'll see in 6 month's time.
Series1boy
Well-known member
- Oct 14, 2013
- 357
- 16
- 18,895
I'm really interested in this TV but I'm going to wait for prices to level out and see what future reviews will come out with too.
i think i would buy later in the year,if it could come down in price by even a grand,heres hoping*drinks*
bigboss said:
The subject has already been broached. It seems, LG is slightly more acceptable than Samsung, though I'm not exactly sure why, and I'm not going to ask. *smile*
The price is the biggest factor at the moment, so I couldn't even consider a 4K OLED tv until the price comes below £2000, and I think that's a long, long way off.
The OP didn't mention this one.
http://www.richersounds.com/product/tv---all/lg/77ec980v/lg-77ec980v
http://www.richersounds.com/product/tv---all/lg/77ec980v/lg-77ec980v
Getting back to sanity, I despair of those luddites at Currys. In advertising the LG 55EG960V television, in this Currys link, note that they have NOT highlighted OLED technology as one of the bullet points! An OLED television not trumpeted as OLED?? Apparently 4K resolution has more pulling power than OLED technology. What would gel say? *scratch_one-s_head*
It's apparently a beautiful machine, but even if I had the money I wouldn't get one, 55 inches is the wrong size for me.
It's apparently a beautiful machine, but even if I had the money I wouldn't get one, 55 inches is the wrong size for me.
I am going to have a demo next week at Currys to see what all the fuss is about. *smile*Son_of_SJ said:
Series1boy
Well-known member
- Oct 14, 2013
- 357
- 16
- 18,895
What do you need to play this Blu-Ray?
http://www.zavvi.com/blu-ray/angels-and-demons-mastered-in-4k-edition-includes-ultraviolet-copy/10814510.html
http://www.zavvi.com/blu-ray/angels-and-demons-mastered-in-4k-edition-includes-ultraviolet-copy/10814510.html
A 4K upscaling one? And I guess a 4K TV? And forgot about the high speed HDMI cables.7760 said:
Series1boy
Well-known member
- Oct 14, 2013
- 357
- 16
- 18,895
It is mastered with 4k content but is still 1080p. No need for different cables, player or tv. It's a big con really as its still 1080p!
even when 4k comes out properly, you can keep your good high speed Hdmi cables, no need to upgrade.
even when 4k comes out properly, you can keep your good high speed Hdmi cables, no need to upgrade.
Series1boy said:
He HAS been told this several times already...
Series1boy said:
How so? The mastering process directly influences the end product on your screen, and there's no claim at all as to these being anything but Full HD. In fact, they existed before any 4K TVs ever appeared.
Series1boy
Well-known member
- Oct 14, 2013
- 357
- 16
- 18,895
Most films are mastered in 4k prior to transfer to BD and by saying mastered in 4K, there is no difference. It is either 1080p or it isn't. It isn't in 4k native is it, it's displaying 1080p and nothing else.
my point to Gel was that it is still 1080p and it isn't 4k. It may have been tidied up, cleaned up by using 4 k software or something else, but it isn't 4k and U.S. what Gel was asking.
my point to Gel was that it is still 1080p and it isn't 4k. It may have been tidied up, cleaned up by using 4 k software or something else, but it isn't 4k and U.S. what Gel was asking.
Similar threads
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram