Q Acoustics 3020 sounds open and clear but not much bass, it sounds rather discret not deep,not punchy like a big speaker, it sort of helps make the sound open and clear, where a speaker like the Dynaudio emit m10 has a more warm,full bodied sound do to more bass and doesn't sound as open,clear as the 3020's
I was hoping the bass was better from the mision LX-2's compared to the Q Acoustics 3020 and knew it where surpose to be deeper (not by specs, 3020 64hz and 60hz for lx-2) because of reviews and what ever those few people that have heard them has written about the bass.
The top is very non intrusive, some say it's slightly recessed and not like the more top,treble focused Q Acoustics 2000/3000 and Dali zensor, which for some can be a good thing since together with the good bass can make the sound less bright,agressive,harsh (less listening fattigue) then speakers like dali zensor, can sound at high levels
The bass from the mission's is just so good, deeper,tighter,more precise, more punchy than Q Acoustics 3020 and alot better than Wharfedale Diamond 220, even at low levels with the good records,even youtube i can now hear bass, i can now hear more of lars ulrichs drums and robert trujillo's bass, not as if my speakers only had a tweeter and a midrange unit (no bass,bass limited by the bass a midrange can play)
There are still music with very little bass that almost never will sound deep,loud and punchy, even the mission LX-2's that i have won't change that
Mission also makes LX-3,LX-4 and LX-5 floorstands, even the small LX-3 must have fantastic bass in medium to large rooms from what i hear with my LX-2's
Im just so happy i finally got some above avarage good bass and metallica sounds they way they should and not almost like thin sounding small active pc speakers like the once from logitech,creative or cheap small active studio monitors
I was hoping the bass was better from the mision LX-2's compared to the Q Acoustics 3020 and knew it where surpose to be deeper (not by specs, 3020 64hz and 60hz for lx-2) because of reviews and what ever those few people that have heard them has written about the bass.
The top is very non intrusive, some say it's slightly recessed and not like the more top,treble focused Q Acoustics 2000/3000 and Dali zensor, which for some can be a good thing since together with the good bass can make the sound less bright,agressive,harsh (less listening fattigue) then speakers like dali zensor, can sound at high levels
The bass from the mission's is just so good, deeper,tighter,more precise, more punchy than Q Acoustics 3020 and alot better than Wharfedale Diamond 220, even at low levels with the good records,even youtube i can now hear bass, i can now hear more of lars ulrichs drums and robert trujillo's bass, not as if my speakers only had a tweeter and a midrange unit (no bass,bass limited by the bass a midrange can play)
There are still music with very little bass that almost never will sound deep,loud and punchy, even the mission LX-2's that i have won't change that
Mission also makes LX-3,LX-4 and LX-5 floorstands, even the small LX-3 must have fantastic bass in medium to large rooms from what i hear with my LX-2's
Im just so happy i finally got some above avarage good bass and metallica sounds they way they should and not almost like thin sounding small active pc speakers like the once from logitech,creative or cheap small active studio monitors