gel said:
Check out this clip too:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RtTIaa-ZgL0
Resolution makes no difference - true from what I have seen.
HDR does make a difference blacker blacks and brighter colours - although some think HDR is too dim for daytime, which basically leaves you screwed! I am still buying the Oppo for the little difference but is it worth it? Will see...
You're
less likely to appreciate the higher resolution on a small TV, that's for sure. But when you get to the point of mega-sized TVs that cover the wall, you'll notice it.
Think about it.
A 32 inch diagonal 21:9 1080p set has 1920 pixels x 1080 pixels. That's about 65.28 pixels per inch horizontally and 85.68 pixels per inch vertically.
Scale that up to (keeping the sums easy) a 96 inch diagonal set, and the pixel count drops to 21.78 horizontally and 28.56 vertically. A 96 inch 3860 x 2160 TV, however, would have 42.52 pixels per inch horizontally and 57.12 pixels per inch vertically.
So on a 32 inch 1080p set each pixel "measures" about 0.4 mm x 0.3 mm. On a 96 inch 1080p set the pixels "measure" 1.2 mm x 0.9 mm, which is getting pretty big, and which is why "huge" TV sets don't look that good if you sit up close.
The pixels on a 96 inch 3860 x 2160 TV, however, measure 0.6 mm x 0.4 mm, fairly close to those on a 32-inch 1080p set, and more less "grainy" to look at close up as a result.
Anyway, our smallest (of three) 4K TVs is a 48-incher, and that looks great - even if the wife insisted on having a curved one and insists on watching the flaming Gimore Girls morning noon and night.