theres no reason why you should see a loss in quality , but the one thing that many hdmi cable tests have in common , is that they often find that good quality cables are generally a safer bet over 3 metres than cheapies ...
well tests found little to no difference at 1 - 3 metres between cables of differing cost , but when testing longer cables , over 3 metres , some of the very cheap cables in some of those tests gave problems , snow like dots on screen , etc .. thats what i read anyway ..
I was reading Which magazine today and they'd performed a series of tests on various HDMI cables. They concluded there was no difference in data transmitted between any of the cables they tested -- their conclusion was you should buy a cheap HDMI cable as it's a waste of money to buy more expensive cables. Surely -- as long as the data remains intact between source and TV (or amp), the length of the HDMI cable would make no difference? I know it's a debate that rages on, but I've tried different HDMI cables in my set-up and I genuinely couldn't notice any difference between them.
I ran a cheapo 15m HDMI (cost about £30) and that is great. Runs from Denon 1909 to a 720p projector. Bluray and HD TV look fine. Took the plunge and plastered it in. May live to regret that but not for a few years at least.
WHF are the only guys in town still claiming that more expensive HDMI leads produce a 'better' picture. Well, them and the manufacturers, of course ;-)
Just make sure that the cable you buy is of decent build so it will give you many years of enjoyment - I've used ThatCable plenty of times and I've been very impressed with how rugged they are for the money.
Daveee:
If I got a 5 metre length HDMI cable to hook up my TV to my amp, would there be any loss in quality over this distance?
Thanks
i think not as i have tried various hdmi cables from £5.00 to £150, from 1m to 10m
and could not see any difirences between the cables
dont waste your money on over hyped hdmi cables just buy cheap well made hdmi cables,
and i am well pleased with myself for not wasting any more cash on over hyped products
just go and try for a demo of hdmi cables it wont happen as they say the cables are in sealed box
and they cant open them up.that should ring the alarm bells, eh
All I can suggest is that, if you're burying your cables into the walls, go for a better build one for peace of mind, or you'll have to break the wall to change the cable. Otherwise, you can always buy a cheapo HDMI cable first & if you're not happy, buy a more expensive one & ebay the cheapo cable.
The same still applies. You'd be better off stuffing a handful of tenners in the wall cavity - that way you'd have the peace of mind of knowing that if times got really hard you could take a chisel to the wall and buy some food. 🙂 The cable is either good enough or it isn't - it's not going to be rendered ineffective because it's buried in the wall.
Now the *smart* thing to do is to go to the extra effort of putting a trunking in the wall that's sufficiently large to enable you to pull a new cable through in future if standards change. I ran a length of flexible ducting under my floor from the AV kit to the screen when I did up the living room. The scart and speaker cables were then joined by an HDMI cable only when i needed it.
Well after hearing the majority of you think cheap HDMI cables are just as effective as expensive ones, I'm quite relieved because I reckon I'll need around a 5-6 metre length. I am a bit annoyed I spent quite a lot on my other QED, Chord and Van den hul HDMI cables though D'OH!
The same still applies. You'd be better off stuffing a handful of tenners in the wall cavity - that way you'd have the peace of mind of knowing that if times got really hard you could take a chisel to the wall and buy some food. 🙂 The cable is either good enough or it isn't - it's not going to be rendered ineffective because it's buried in the wall.
Now the *smart* thing to do is to go to the extra effort of putting a trunking in the wall that's sufficiently large to enable you to pull a new cable through in future if standards change. I ran a length of flexible ducting under my floor from the AV kit to the screen when I did up the living room. The scart and speaker cables were then joined by an HDMI cable only when i needed it.
I don't think you really got my point. I don't believe that expensive cables offer better performance over cheaper cables. But some of the HDMI cables are shoddily made & may get damaged in the wall cavity. A better constructed (which DOES NOT mean expensive) cable should be used. Even ThatCable has an excellent build quality & it's not expensive.
I did get your point, I just don't agree with it. There's no more reason for a cheap cable to get damaged in the wall cavity any more than an expensive one. In fact you could argue the opposite - that theres LESS value in a 'premium' cable in the wall because it's protected and isn't going to get stepped on/a piece of furniture put on top of it.
Now there's no harm in having a well made cable but a lot of the more premium cables just bulk up the outer plastic insulation and the plug. This does nothing for signal quality but, since HDMI isn't a 'locking' design (i much prefer DVI) this can either lead to the cable pulling out of a vertical socket or putting a lot of leverage on a horizontal one. It's the Scart problem all over again - I ended up using freebie flat Scart cables for most of my connections as they were lighter and far less problematic.
There's no more reason for a cheap cable to get damaged in the wall cavity any more than an expensive one.
Again, read my post. I have never mentioned the cost of cable. I never said to go for an expensive cable. A better built cable doesn't necessarily have to be expensive. ThatCable is one of the cheapest cables in the market & has an excellent build quality.
Please accept my apologies - ThatCables stuff looks excellent value. I'd briefly glanced at the front page and assumed it was £5 per metre (ie £25+ for a 5m cable) but it's nothing of the sort. All their cables look like good buys actually.