shooter said:Sorry Wishtree, i've just seen this.
Great, you've found the tutorial
For all interested parties its here: http://www.dctrwatson.com/2011/06/os-x-system-equalizer/
Have fun!
lindsayt said:Most hi-fi systems don't get close to live. Some do.
WishTree said:This learning experience is just amazing..!!
I just managed to tame the slight harshness in vocals by reducing the 1Khz to 3khz by 0.5db. This is such a minute change but the whole equation changed!!
Sound Mixing Engineer who mixed the track is no longer in-charge, I can over-ride him where & when & if I need![]()
WishTree said:I just configured two EQ settings one for playing music (which I am still not using) but another for movies which is really helpful to boost the center / vocals to help dialogies. I really need to fine tune the EQ settings for movie watching but more or less it is my solution for avoiding the center speaker and an AV Receiver (just stay with HiFi setup) for computer based movie watching.
shooter said:I'm glad your finding it usefull, the minor tweaking is very effective at getting some good results. I was sceptical to begin but after playing around with it, i now couldn't live without it. The only caveat is that i cant find a way to get it to work wirelessly. iTunes native EQ will work streamed via an AEX or ATV, for some reason i cant get the AULabs EQ to stream, there may be a way but i havent found it yet.
shooter said:Yep, it's a great little tool AU Labs and along with the other effects that you can play around with makes it a versitile application.
Personally i think this is the best way to have a cinema set up, 2 or 2.1 channel with a phantom centre is better than a dedicated 2 mid 1 tweeter centre, you hear a mix of direct and reflective sound with the reflective sound adding delay, you don't get that with a phantom. 8)
shooter said:I've had some great results using a digital EQ in my system of late because for a long time i've had issues with very poor bass responce. I set the speakers up the best i could at a 1m off the corners and 30cm off the back wall, that possition gave the best overall balance, further away from the back wall and the sound started to get 'thin', closer and the bass started to 'boom', the overall sound still lacking though, basically i needed more cones.
I've lived with the set up for a few years but over time have been putting all my music on a HD and playing it through iTunes. With it i started playing around the iTunes own 10 band EQ which gave me the option of tweaking and it helped with the poor low frequencies in the room though but felt i needed more control.
Now i'm using Apples free AU Labs 31 band EQ with Soundflower which gives me more control. I dont know if its totally transparent but it has transformed the music, just by adding a very small amount of db's (scaled 0 to 2db's) from 50hz down to 20hz has added a solid foundation with bass that goes deep but still stays clean, perfect!
As a bit of fun i've also been able to play around with the EQ to counteract the "energy" i have in the upper mid by flattening the peaks a db or two.
Chuffed!
shafesk said:Playing with EQ? :shhh: Well most audiophiles would never touch an EQ with a large pole, I for instance have an amp which does not have bass or treble controls. I much prefer to tune the sound with cables and interconnects, I find it more organic. The thing is, the perfectionist side of me needs that...I couldn't live with myself if I use an EQ, it takes away the fun out of tweaking. I'm happy for you, if it achieves the same results then its great, you've done for free what I achieved with a lot of effort and time. I hope I'm not contradicting myself here, I'm just trying to state that people take different measures to solve the same problem. Some would have thought that me, having a masters in economics would prefer the free solution. The heart wants what it wants I guess. Cheers to you buddy, glad to see you have found a solution to your problems. :cheers:
Best Regards,
Shafin