Watching Top Gun on Apple TV through my amp and speakers and comparing to my Top Gun 4K Blu-ray through my 4K Blu-ray player, amp and speakers it was hard to distinguish between the two different sound and picture quality.
Not sure this is entirely true. Those streaming options will be sat on power hungry servers somewhere using energy 24/7. They may or may not be fuelled by green energy but then there are the drives and other hardware it's running on to consider with rare earth metals etc. I imagine streaming comes out on top but it's probably not as cut and dried as you might think.Sadly discs are also seen as bad for the environment from raw materials used to press them . Energy wastegage . Delivery to retailer etc...downloads have none of these so called drawbacks. I can guarantee however once discs stop the studios will then move on to special edition downloads that contain extras or are a bigger/better quality file and charge a premium and we will all start are library again!
Stacey Dooley. Doing a right job. Erm not possible.I don't expect 't investigative journalism.', if I did I'd get the job done right by Stacey Dooley, not badly by What HI Fii
Please explain how some thing USA focussed can have the slightest relivance to ewe kay audiences?
Can we expect an article on gun ownership in the next issue, please?
I suspect it depends upon how often the disc is played - there's likely to be a crossover point.Those streaming options will be sat on power hungry servers somewhere using energy 24/7.
Did we not forget that the film industry came to a grinding halt when Covid broke out, its no wonder that DVD/Blu-ray sales have declined and as we now move into world recession, its going to get worse.Discs are on their way out, and UHD Blu-ray is taking a bigger share of the diminishing market.
DVD and Blu-ray sales continue to nosedive : Read more
I'm curious as to why you say this, not that I would be complaining if that had happened. It looks like current films (i.e. not old stuff coming to 4k) are £20-25 for 4k, £15 for BR and £10 for DVD (that's looking at the last Jurassic Park rehash and Nope on Amazon UK) - I'm just wondering why you think 4k should cost what DVD does.The fact is the cost of Blu-ray should have dropped to around £10 for a 4k Blu-ray movie more than two years back
My take is it's a digital file burned onto an optical disc....there is no reason for the excessive premium for 4K discs other than greedy profiteering...which ultimately has killed off the medium.I'm curious as to why you say this, not that I would be complaining if that had happened. It looks like current films (i.e. not old stuff coming to 4k) are £20-25 for 4k, £15 for BR and £10 for DVD (that's looking at the last Jurassic Park rehash and Nope on Amazon UK) - I'm just wondering why you think 4k should cost what DVD does.
You could argue that there's more data, so the price should be higher? I'm slightly playing devil's advocate here. What I suppose I was really asking is why the previous poster thinks DVD and 4K should cost the same.My take is it's a digital file burned onto an optical disc....there is no reason for the excessive premium for 4K discs other than greedy profiteering...which ultimately has killed off the medium.
I don't really accept the 'more data' argument...technology/storage moves on and usually gets cheaper, and it is still a single disc.You could argue that there's more data, so the price should be higher? I'm slightly playing devil's advocate here. What I suppose I was really asking is why the previous poster thinks DVD and 4K should cost the same.
Besides, 4k discs are increasing their share of the market as I understand it, it's the market a s a whole that's shrinking. I think 4k sales are slowly increasing, but don't quote me on that...
I suspect (again, being kind) that there are remaster costs to amortise, but it does feel as though the enthusiast is penalised with prices as they are.I don't really accept the 'more data' argument...technology/storage moves on and usually gets cheaper, and it is still a single disc.
I just think the pricing/marketing strategy for 4K blu-ray video discs was wrong from the start. Someone in a Sony marketing department may have thought they were not going to sell in high volumes....
Just imagine for a moment if 4K discs had launched at £15 and hailed as 'ground breaking' advance in video quality....HD bluray prices would have dropped to c.£10 or less....and DVD would have been obsolete. They would have sold millions and millions more discs worldwide and still would be selling!
Plus we would have more decent affordable machines to play them on....
People like to have their own physical movie collection but baulk at a certain price point.. it's just not perceived as good value any more.
Unfortunately Sony have a track record with this...just look how they ruined/abandoned SACD.I suspect (again, being kind) that there are remaster costs to amortise, but it does feel as though the enthusiast is penalised with prices as they are.
I also suspect that physical media in general are in massive decline, and that there's no way of interesting those who have grown up streaming in something physical, even if it's visibly better to those of us who care. This shrinking market is only going to push prices up. And on top of that you've got the 'posh' editions - which don't interest me, by and large. There are only so many extras worth having (very few as far as I am concerned), so who gives a stuff about what is effectively extra packaging?
I don't really care for it all, but will buy 4k discs of the things I love - though using ebay and buying from other markets offers the odd bargain, as well as access to things for which there's no UK disc.